Cargando…

A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.

In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perren, T. J., Wiltshaw, E., Harper, P., Slevin, M., Stein, R., Tan, S., Gore, M., Fryatt, I. J., Blake, P. R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8260372
_version_ 1782134787959422976
author Perren, T. J.
Wiltshaw, E.
Harper, P.
Slevin, M.
Stein, R.
Tan, S.
Gore, M.
Fryatt, I. J.
Blake, P. R.
author_facet Perren, T. J.
Wiltshaw, E.
Harper, P.
Slevin, M.
Stein, R.
Tan, S.
Gore, M.
Fryatt, I. J.
Blake, P. R.
author_sort Perren, T. J.
collection PubMed
description In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single agent carboplatin. Ifosfamide was given every 3 weeks in a dose of 5 gm m-2 as a 24 h infusion with mesna, 1 gm m-2 by i.v. bolus prior to ifosfamide, 3 gm m-2 with ifosfamide, and 1 gm m-2 as an 8 h infusion after ifosfamide. Carboplatin was given in a dose of 400 mg m-2 by short i.v. infusion every 4 weeks. Sixty-eight evaluable patients were randomised to sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin, and 67 to single agent carboplatin. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 5.5-82.3). After three cycles of treatment two patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 12 partial remission (PR) for an overall response rate of 29%, whereas in the carboplatin arm ten patients achieved CR, and 23 PR, for an overall response rate of 63% (P = 0.0008). Seven of 15 patients with progressive disease, and nine of 20 patients with stable disease at the initial response evaluation, following three cycles of ifosfamide, subsequently responded to carboplatin therapy so that the final response rate to the complete regimen was 65% for the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, compared to 71% for the carboplatin arm (NS). For the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, median recurrence free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months and 18.7 months. Corresponding figures for the carboplatin arm were 14.5 months and 21.5 months (NS). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. However 47% of patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm developed alopecia sufficient to require a wig, compared to only 2% in the carboplatin arm. Ifosfamide is clearly less effective, and more toxic than carboplatin. Ifosfamide failures can however be effectively salvaged by subsequent carboplatin treatment. Ifosfamide cannot be recommended for single agent therapy in ovarian carcinoma, however the combination of carboplatin plus ifosfamide might be a suitable treatment to be tested in a future randomised study against carboplatin alone.
format Text
id pubmed-1968655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19686552009-09-10 A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group. Perren, T. J. Wiltshaw, E. Harper, P. Slevin, M. Stein, R. Tan, S. Gore, M. Fryatt, I. J. Blake, P. R. Br J Cancer Research Article In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single agent carboplatin. Ifosfamide was given every 3 weeks in a dose of 5 gm m-2 as a 24 h infusion with mesna, 1 gm m-2 by i.v. bolus prior to ifosfamide, 3 gm m-2 with ifosfamide, and 1 gm m-2 as an 8 h infusion after ifosfamide. Carboplatin was given in a dose of 400 mg m-2 by short i.v. infusion every 4 weeks. Sixty-eight evaluable patients were randomised to sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin, and 67 to single agent carboplatin. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 5.5-82.3). After three cycles of treatment two patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 12 partial remission (PR) for an overall response rate of 29%, whereas in the carboplatin arm ten patients achieved CR, and 23 PR, for an overall response rate of 63% (P = 0.0008). Seven of 15 patients with progressive disease, and nine of 20 patients with stable disease at the initial response evaluation, following three cycles of ifosfamide, subsequently responded to carboplatin therapy so that the final response rate to the complete regimen was 65% for the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, compared to 71% for the carboplatin arm (NS). For the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, median recurrence free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months and 18.7 months. Corresponding figures for the carboplatin arm were 14.5 months and 21.5 months (NS). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. However 47% of patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm developed alopecia sufficient to require a wig, compared to only 2% in the carboplatin arm. Ifosfamide is clearly less effective, and more toxic than carboplatin. Ifosfamide failures can however be effectively salvaged by subsequent carboplatin treatment. Ifosfamide cannot be recommended for single agent therapy in ovarian carcinoma, however the combination of carboplatin plus ifosfamide might be a suitable treatment to be tested in a future randomised study against carboplatin alone. Nature Publishing Group 1993-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1968655/ /pubmed/8260372 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perren, T. J.
Wiltshaw, E.
Harper, P.
Slevin, M.
Stein, R.
Tan, S.
Gore, M.
Fryatt, I. J.
Blake, P. R.
A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title_full A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title_fullStr A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title_full_unstemmed A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title_short A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.
title_sort randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with figo stage iii epithelial ovarian carcinoma. the london gynaecologic oncology group.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8260372
work_keys_str_mv AT perrentj arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT wiltshawe arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT harperp arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT slevinm arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT steinr arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT tans arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT gorem arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT fryattij arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT blakepr arandomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT perrentj randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT wiltshawe randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT harperp randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT slevinm randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT steinr randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT tans randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT gorem randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT fryattij randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup
AT blakepr randomisedstudyofcarboplatinvssequentialifosfamidecarboplatinforpatientswithfigostageiiiepithelialovariancarcinomathelondongynaecologiconcologygroup