Cargando…

Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.

Antibody targeting has potential for selective delivery of cancer therapy. However, there is a wide variation in the degree of antibody localisation in individual patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Colorectal adenocarcinomas are composed of glandular structures separated from fibrovascular str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boxer, G. M., Abassi, A. M., Pedley, R. B., Begent, R. H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7507692
_version_ 1782134799190720512
author Boxer, G. M.
Abassi, A. M.
Pedley, R. B.
Begent, R. H.
author_facet Boxer, G. M.
Abassi, A. M.
Pedley, R. B.
Begent, R. H.
author_sort Boxer, G. M.
collection PubMed
description Antibody targeting has potential for selective delivery of cancer therapy. However, there is a wide variation in the degree of antibody localisation in individual patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Colorectal adenocarcinomas are composed of glandular structures separated from fibrovascular stroma by a basal lamina which may represent a significant barrier to extravasated antibody. Basement membrane-associated CEA epitopes may be more accessible to antibodies than those which are cytoplasmic or lumenal. We have investigated by immunohistochemistry and in vivo localisation, the extent to which distribution of antigen epitopes influences targeting. Two monoclonal antibodies (A5B7 and EA77) recognising non-overlapping CEA epitopes were reacted immunohistochemically with samples of 39 tumours. Intensity and site of reaction were assessed for basement membrane, cytoplasmic or lumenal surface association. 125I-labelled antibodies were injected into nude mice bearing LS174T tumour. Per cent injected activity per gram was measured in tumour and normal tissues, 24, 72 and 168 h later. Tissues reacted immunohistochemically for CEA were autoradiographed to assess the relationship of injected antibody to target antigen. Immunohistochemistry showed that A5B7 antibody favours basement membrane aspects of malignant glands; in contrast, EA77 concentrated generally on lumenal surfaces. In vivo localisation showed that per cent inj.act g-1 in tumour for A5B7 reached 36.5% at 24 h. EA77 localised to a lesser extent (9.1% at 24 h), despite a longer circulatory half-life. Autoradiography combined with immunohistochemistry showed A5B7 reacting with antigen close to vasculature after 24 h, slowly penetrating deeper parts of the tumour by 72 h. In contrast, EA77 was confined mainly to fibrovascular stroma, showing little labelling of antigen-positive tumour cells. Localisation differences between A5B7 and EA77 may partly be due to accessibility of epitopes on tumour cells. IMAGES:
format Text
id pubmed-1968707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19687072009-09-10 Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy. Boxer, G. M. Abassi, A. M. Pedley, R. B. Begent, R. H. Br J Cancer Research Article Antibody targeting has potential for selective delivery of cancer therapy. However, there is a wide variation in the degree of antibody localisation in individual patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Colorectal adenocarcinomas are composed of glandular structures separated from fibrovascular stroma by a basal lamina which may represent a significant barrier to extravasated antibody. Basement membrane-associated CEA epitopes may be more accessible to antibodies than those which are cytoplasmic or lumenal. We have investigated by immunohistochemistry and in vivo localisation, the extent to which distribution of antigen epitopes influences targeting. Two monoclonal antibodies (A5B7 and EA77) recognising non-overlapping CEA epitopes were reacted immunohistochemically with samples of 39 tumours. Intensity and site of reaction were assessed for basement membrane, cytoplasmic or lumenal surface association. 125I-labelled antibodies were injected into nude mice bearing LS174T tumour. Per cent injected activity per gram was measured in tumour and normal tissues, 24, 72 and 168 h later. Tissues reacted immunohistochemically for CEA were autoradiographed to assess the relationship of injected antibody to target antigen. Immunohistochemistry showed that A5B7 antibody favours basement membrane aspects of malignant glands; in contrast, EA77 concentrated generally on lumenal surfaces. In vivo localisation showed that per cent inj.act g-1 in tumour for A5B7 reached 36.5% at 24 h. EA77 localised to a lesser extent (9.1% at 24 h), despite a longer circulatory half-life. Autoradiography combined with immunohistochemistry showed A5B7 reacting with antigen close to vasculature after 24 h, slowly penetrating deeper parts of the tumour by 72 h. In contrast, EA77 was confined mainly to fibrovascular stroma, showing little labelling of antigen-positive tumour cells. Localisation differences between A5B7 and EA77 may partly be due to accessibility of epitopes on tumour cells. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1994-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1968707/ /pubmed/7507692 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boxer, G. M.
Abassi, A. M.
Pedley, R. B.
Begent, R. H.
Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title_full Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title_fullStr Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title_full_unstemmed Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title_short Localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)--implications for targeted therapy.
title_sort localisation of monoclonal antibodies reacting with different epitopes on carcinoembryonic antigen (cea)--implications for targeted therapy.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7507692
work_keys_str_mv AT boxergm localisationofmonoclonalantibodiesreactingwithdifferentepitopesoncarcinoembryonicantigenceaimplicationsfortargetedtherapy
AT abassiam localisationofmonoclonalantibodiesreactingwithdifferentepitopesoncarcinoembryonicantigenceaimplicationsfortargetedtherapy
AT pedleyrb localisationofmonoclonalantibodiesreactingwithdifferentepitopesoncarcinoembryonicantigenceaimplicationsfortargetedtherapy
AT begentrh localisationofmonoclonalantibodiesreactingwithdifferentepitopesoncarcinoembryonicantigenceaimplicationsfortargetedtherapy