Cargando…
Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis.
In the course of an investigation of melanocytic naevus development in Queensland, Australia, whole-body naevus counts of 66 adolescents were performed separately by two nurse examiners on two occasions on average 4 weeks apart. There was good agreement between the two examiners for counts of total...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1994
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8123478 |
_version_ | 1782134831342157824 |
---|---|
author | Aitken, J. F. Green, A. Eldridge, A. Green, L. Pfitzner, J. Battistutta, D. Martin, N. G. |
author_facet | Aitken, J. F. Green, A. Eldridge, A. Green, L. Pfitzner, J. Battistutta, D. Martin, N. G. |
author_sort | Aitken, J. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the course of an investigation of melanocytic naevus development in Queensland, Australia, whole-body naevus counts of 66 adolescents were performed separately by two nurse examiners on two occasions on average 4 weeks apart. There was good agreement between the two examiners for counts of total naevi on the whole body (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96) and at selected subsites (face, neck, back, upper arms, lower arms). Agreement was lower when raised naevi only were counted (0.83). Intra-examiner repeatability was high for both nurses, particularly for the more experienced examiner (intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.98 and 0.91 for total naevi on the whole body), and was consistently better when all naevi were counted rather than naevi of a particular size. Independent counts of naevi on the back using a computer imaging technique were reproducible (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92), but showed only moderate agreement with counts by the nurse examiners. Overall, these results demonstrate high comparability of naevus counts between and within similarly trained examiners. They do not support the common practice in epidemiological studies of restricting counts to naevi larger than 2 mm, or of counting raised naevi only. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1968854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1994 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19688542009-09-10 Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. Aitken, J. F. Green, A. Eldridge, A. Green, L. Pfitzner, J. Battistutta, D. Martin, N. G. Br J Cancer Research Article In the course of an investigation of melanocytic naevus development in Queensland, Australia, whole-body naevus counts of 66 adolescents were performed separately by two nurse examiners on two occasions on average 4 weeks apart. There was good agreement between the two examiners for counts of total naevi on the whole body (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96) and at selected subsites (face, neck, back, upper arms, lower arms). Agreement was lower when raised naevi only were counted (0.83). Intra-examiner repeatability was high for both nurses, particularly for the more experienced examiner (intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.98 and 0.91 for total naevi on the whole body), and was consistently better when all naevi were counted rather than naevi of a particular size. Independent counts of naevi on the back using a computer imaging technique were reproducible (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92), but showed only moderate agreement with counts by the nurse examiners. Overall, these results demonstrate high comparability of naevus counts between and within similarly trained examiners. They do not support the common practice in epidemiological studies of restricting counts to naevi larger than 2 mm, or of counting raised naevi only. Nature Publishing Group 1994-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1968854/ /pubmed/8123478 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aitken, J. F. Green, A. Eldridge, A. Green, L. Pfitzner, J. Battistutta, D. Martin, N. G. Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title | Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title_full | Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title_fullStr | Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title_short | Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
title_sort | comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1968854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8123478 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aitkenjf comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT greena comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT eldridgea comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT greenl comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT pfitznerj comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT battistuttad comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis AT martinng comparabilityofnaevuscountsbetweenandwithinexaminersandcomparisonwithcomputerimageanalysis |