Cargando…

A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru

BACKGROUND: The cost of mosquito repellents in Latin America has discouraged their wider use among the poor. To address this problem, a low-cost repellent was developed that reduces the level of expensive repellent actives by combining them with inexpensive fixatives that appear to slow repellent ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Sarah J, Darling, Samuel T, Sihuincha, Moisés, Padilla, Norma, Devine, Gregor J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-101
_version_ 1782134861320945664
author Moore, Sarah J
Darling, Samuel T
Sihuincha, Moisés
Padilla, Norma
Devine, Gregor J
author_facet Moore, Sarah J
Darling, Samuel T
Sihuincha, Moisés
Padilla, Norma
Devine, Gregor J
author_sort Moore, Sarah J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cost of mosquito repellents in Latin America has discouraged their wider use among the poor. To address this problem, a low-cost repellent was developed that reduces the level of expensive repellent actives by combining them with inexpensive fixatives that appear to slow repellent evaporation. The chosen actives were a mixture of para-menthane-diol (PMD) and lemongrass oil (LG). METHODS: To test the efficacy of the repellent, field trials were staged in Guatemala and Peru. Repellent efficacy was determined by human-landing catches on volunteers who wore the experimental repellents, control, or 15% DEET. The studies were conducted using a balanced Latin Square design with volunteers, treatments, and locations rotated each night. RESULTS: In Guatemala, collections were performed for two hours, commencing three hours after repellent application. The repellent provided >98% protection for five hours after application, with a biting pressure of >100 landings per person/hour. The 15% DEET control provided lower protection at 92% (p < 0.0001). In Peru, collections were performed for four hours, commencing two hours after repellent application. The PMD/LG repellent provided 95% protection for six hours after application with a biting pressure of >46 landings per person/hour. The 20% DEET control provided significantly lower protection at 64% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In both locations, the PMD/LG repellent provided excellent protection up to six hours after application against a wide range of disease vectors including Anopheles darlingi. The addition of fixatives to the repellent extended its longevity while enhancing efficacy and significantly reducing its cost to malaria-endemic communities.
format Text
id pubmed-1971064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19710642007-09-07 A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru Moore, Sarah J Darling, Samuel T Sihuincha, Moisés Padilla, Norma Devine, Gregor J Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The cost of mosquito repellents in Latin America has discouraged their wider use among the poor. To address this problem, a low-cost repellent was developed that reduces the level of expensive repellent actives by combining them with inexpensive fixatives that appear to slow repellent evaporation. The chosen actives were a mixture of para-menthane-diol (PMD) and lemongrass oil (LG). METHODS: To test the efficacy of the repellent, field trials were staged in Guatemala and Peru. Repellent efficacy was determined by human-landing catches on volunteers who wore the experimental repellents, control, or 15% DEET. The studies were conducted using a balanced Latin Square design with volunteers, treatments, and locations rotated each night. RESULTS: In Guatemala, collections were performed for two hours, commencing three hours after repellent application. The repellent provided >98% protection for five hours after application, with a biting pressure of >100 landings per person/hour. The 15% DEET control provided lower protection at 92% (p < 0.0001). In Peru, collections were performed for four hours, commencing two hours after repellent application. The PMD/LG repellent provided 95% protection for six hours after application with a biting pressure of >46 landings per person/hour. The 20% DEET control provided significantly lower protection at 64% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In both locations, the PMD/LG repellent provided excellent protection up to six hours after application against a wide range of disease vectors including Anopheles darlingi. The addition of fixatives to the repellent extended its longevity while enhancing efficacy and significantly reducing its cost to malaria-endemic communities. BioMed Central 2007-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1971064/ /pubmed/17678537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-101 Text en Copyright © 2007 Moore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Moore, Sarah J
Darling, Samuel T
Sihuincha, Moisés
Padilla, Norma
Devine, Gregor J
A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title_full A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title_fullStr A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title_full_unstemmed A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title_short A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru
title_sort low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the americas: results of two field trials in guatemala and peru
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-101
work_keys_str_mv AT mooresarahj alowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT darlingsamuelt alowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT sihuinchamoises alowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT padillanorma alowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT devinegregorj alowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT mooresarahj lowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT darlingsamuelt lowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT sihuinchamoises lowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT padillanorma lowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu
AT devinegregorj lowcostrepellentformalariavectorsintheamericasresultsoftwofieldtrialsinguatemalaandperu