Cargando…

Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.

A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haybittle, J. L., Alcock, C. J., Fowler, J. F., Hopewell, J. W., Rezvani, M., Wiernik, G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2223591
_version_ 1782134923807686656
author Haybittle, J. L.
Alcock, C. J.
Fowler, J. F.
Hopewell, J. W.
Rezvani, M.
Wiernik, G.
author_facet Haybittle, J. L.
Alcock, C. J.
Fowler, J. F.
Hopewell, J. W.
Rezvani, M.
Wiernik, G.
author_sort Haybittle, J. L.
collection PubMed
description A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence.
format Text
id pubmed-1971500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19715002009-09-10 Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. Haybittle, J. L. Alcock, C. J. Fowler, J. F. Hopewell, J. W. Rezvani, M. Wiernik, G. Br J Cancer Research Article A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence. Nature Publishing Group 1990-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1971500/ /pubmed/2223591 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haybittle, J. L.
Alcock, C. J.
Fowler, J. F.
Hopewell, J. W.
Rezvani, M.
Wiernik, G.
Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title_full Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title_fullStr Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title_short Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
title_sort recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2223591
work_keys_str_mv AT haybittlejl recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy
AT alcockcj recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy
AT fowlerjf recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy
AT hopewelljw recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy
AT rezvanim recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy
AT wiernikg recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy