Cargando…
Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study.
A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2223591 |
_version_ | 1782134923807686656 |
---|---|
author | Haybittle, J. L. Alcock, C. J. Fowler, J. F. Hopewell, J. W. Rezvani, M. Wiernik, G. |
author_facet | Haybittle, J. L. Alcock, C. J. Fowler, J. F. Hopewell, J. W. Rezvani, M. Wiernik, G. |
author_sort | Haybittle, J. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1971500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19715002009-09-10 Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. Haybittle, J. L. Alcock, C. J. Fowler, J. F. Hopewell, J. W. Rezvani, M. Wiernik, G. Br J Cancer Research Article A study has been made of the way in which the number of events available for analysis in a clinical trial was dependent on the recruitment period, the maximum follow-up time on individual patients and the length of time between the start of the trial and its analysis. The events considered were deaths, local recurrences and late radiation effects on normal tissue in patients treated for cancer of the laryngo-pharynx by two different fractionation regimes. The relationship is demonstrated between the number of events and the 95% confidence intervals that can be placed on differences between results in the two arms of the trial. It was found, in this particular trial, that no significant improvement in precision was gained by following up patients beyond 5 years or carrying out the analysis later than 2 years after the end of recruitment. The results are discussed in the context of the initial design of clinical trials, particularly those in which the aim is to test therapeutic equivalence. Nature Publishing Group 1990-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1971500/ /pubmed/2223591 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haybittle, J. L. Alcock, C. J. Fowler, J. F. Hopewell, J. W. Rezvani, M. Wiernik, G. Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title | Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title_full | Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title_fullStr | Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title_short | Recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
title_sort | recruitment, follow-up and analysis times in clinical trials of cancer treatment: a case study. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2223591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haybittlejl recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy AT alcockcj recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy AT fowlerjf recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy AT hopewelljw recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy AT rezvanim recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy AT wiernikg recruitmentfollowupandanalysistimesinclinicaltrialsofcancertreatmentacasestudy |