Cargando…

The process of peer-review.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Twentyman, P., Selby, P.
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Nature Publishing Group 1991
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1997091

Ejemplares similares

The role of the clinical editor.
por: Selby, P., et al.
Publicado: (1991)

From receipt to publication.
por: Twentyman, P., et al.
Publicado: (1990)

The peer review process
por: Tumin, Dmitry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer-reviewed process: is everything valid?
por: Piñero, David P.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2017)

Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
por: Sprowson, A. P., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports
por: Makarem, Adham, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The way ahead
por: Twentyman, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (1991)

Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali
Publicado: (2023)

Peer review and the publication process
por: Ali, Parveen Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
por: Wicherts, Jelte M.
Publicado: (2016)

Process of peer review continues
por: Dhammi, Ish Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Transparent Peer Review: A Look Inside the Peer Review Process
por: Garakyaraghi, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
por: D’Andrea, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006)

Reliability of the Peer-Review Process for Adverse Event Rating
por: Forster, Alan J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
por: Marcoci, Alexandru, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process
por: Strauss, Dana, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process
por: Giordan, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer review
por: Ferguson, Robert P., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
por: Mathieu, Sylvain, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective
por: Huisman, Janine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Process modeling and bottleneck mining in online peer-review systems
por: Premchaiswadi, Wichian, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
por: Davis, Catherine H., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The state of the art in peer review
por: Tennant, Jonathan P
Publicado: (2018)

A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
por: Rombey, Tanja, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Anatomy and physiology of peer review process, can it be unbiased?
por: Kumar, Arun H. S.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer review processes and related issues in scholarly journals
por: Saeidnia, Soodabeh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Peer Review Process: Underwriting Manuscript Quality & Validity
por: Santini, Ario
Publicado: (2018)

Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

JID Innovations and Peer Review
por: Hall, Russell P.
Publicado: (2021)

Peering into peer-review at GigaScience
por: Edmunds, Scott C
Publicado: (2013)

Quality control of the peer-review process by Forensic Sciences Research
por: Li, Shiying
Publicado: (2019)

"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
por: Chirico, Francesco
Publicado: (2017)

Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
por: Margalit, Noam, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peering at the people and process of particle physics
Publicado: (2009)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fhqso44f1moc8al1dmcm2dbf55