Cargando…

Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.

A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat highe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palli, D., Bianchi, S., Cipriani, F., Duca, P., Amorosi, A., Avellini, C., Russo, A., Saragoni, A., Todde, P., Valdes, E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1991
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1972379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039701
_version_ 1782135015975419904
author Palli, D.
Bianchi, S.
Cipriani, F.
Duca, P.
Amorosi, A.
Avellini, C.
Russo, A.
Saragoni, A.
Todde, P.
Valdes, E.
author_facet Palli, D.
Bianchi, S.
Cipriani, F.
Duca, P.
Amorosi, A.
Avellini, C.
Russo, A.
Saragoni, A.
Todde, P.
Valdes, E.
author_sort Palli, D.
collection PubMed
description A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat higher when using the Lauren rather than the Ming or World Health Organization classification systems. Histologic types from reading biopsy tissue agreed with those derived from surgical specimens for 65-75% of the 100 tumours. Intra-observer agreement in histologic classification, assessed by repeat readings up to 3 years apart by one pathologist, was 95%. The findings indicate that, although overall concordance was good, it is important to standardise diagnoses in multi-centre epidemiologic studies of GC by histologic type.
format Text
id pubmed-1972379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1991
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19723792009-09-10 Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. Palli, D. Bianchi, S. Cipriani, F. Duca, P. Amorosi, A. Avellini, C. Russo, A. Saragoni, A. Todde, P. Valdes, E. Br J Cancer Research Article A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat higher when using the Lauren rather than the Ming or World Health Organization classification systems. Histologic types from reading biopsy tissue agreed with those derived from surgical specimens for 65-75% of the 100 tumours. Intra-observer agreement in histologic classification, assessed by repeat readings up to 3 years apart by one pathologist, was 95%. The findings indicate that, although overall concordance was good, it is important to standardise diagnoses in multi-centre epidemiologic studies of GC by histologic type. Nature Publishing Group 1991-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1972379/ /pubmed/2039701 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Palli, D.
Bianchi, S.
Cipriani, F.
Duca, P.
Amorosi, A.
Avellini, C.
Russo, A.
Saragoni, A.
Todde, P.
Valdes, E.
Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title_full Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title_fullStr Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title_short Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
title_sort reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1972379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039701
work_keys_str_mv AT pallid reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT bianchis reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT ciprianif reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT ducap reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT amorosia reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT avellinic reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT russoa reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT saragonia reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT toddep reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer
AT valdese reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer