Cargando…
Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer.
A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat highe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1991
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1972379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039701 |
_version_ | 1782135015975419904 |
---|---|
author | Palli, D. Bianchi, S. Cipriani, F. Duca, P. Amorosi, A. Avellini, C. Russo, A. Saragoni, A. Todde, P. Valdes, E. |
author_facet | Palli, D. Bianchi, S. Cipriani, F. Duca, P. Amorosi, A. Avellini, C. Russo, A. Saragoni, A. Todde, P. Valdes, E. |
author_sort | Palli, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat higher when using the Lauren rather than the Ming or World Health Organization classification systems. Histologic types from reading biopsy tissue agreed with those derived from surgical specimens for 65-75% of the 100 tumours. Intra-observer agreement in histologic classification, assessed by repeat readings up to 3 years apart by one pathologist, was 95%. The findings indicate that, although overall concordance was good, it is important to standardise diagnoses in multi-centre epidemiologic studies of GC by histologic type. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1972379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1991 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19723792009-09-10 Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. Palli, D. Bianchi, S. Cipriani, F. Duca, P. Amorosi, A. Avellini, C. Russo, A. Saragoni, A. Todde, P. Valdes, E. Br J Cancer Research Article A panel review of histologic specimens was carried out as part of a multi-centre case-control study of gastric cancer (GC) and diet. Comparisons of diagnoses of 100 GCs by six pathologists revealed agreement in histologic classification for about 70-80% of the cancers. Concordance was somewhat higher when using the Lauren rather than the Ming or World Health Organization classification systems. Histologic types from reading biopsy tissue agreed with those derived from surgical specimens for 65-75% of the 100 tumours. Intra-observer agreement in histologic classification, assessed by repeat readings up to 3 years apart by one pathologist, was 95%. The findings indicate that, although overall concordance was good, it is important to standardise diagnoses in multi-centre epidemiologic studies of GC by histologic type. Nature Publishing Group 1991-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1972379/ /pubmed/2039701 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Palli, D. Bianchi, S. Cipriani, F. Duca, P. Amorosi, A. Avellini, C. Russo, A. Saragoni, A. Todde, P. Valdes, E. Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title | Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title_full | Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title_short | Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
title_sort | reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1972379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pallid reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT bianchis reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT ciprianif reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT ducap reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT amorosia reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT avellinic reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT russoa reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT saragonia reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT toddep reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer AT valdese reproducibilityofhistologicclassificationofgastriccancer |