Cargando…

Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET

Early assessment of response to chemotherapy with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is becoming a routine part of management in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Changes in FDG uptake can occur soon after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacManus, Michael P, Seymour, John F, Hicks, Rodney J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1974859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17766210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0004
_version_ 1782135051889147904
author MacManus, Michael P
Seymour, John F
Hicks, Rodney J
author_facet MacManus, Michael P
Seymour, John F
Hicks, Rodney J
author_sort MacManus, Michael P
collection PubMed
description Early assessment of response to chemotherapy with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is becoming a routine part of management in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Changes in FDG uptake can occur soon after the initiation of therapy and they precede changes in tumour volume. Recent studies in uniform populations of aggressive lymphomas (predominantly diffuse large B cell lymphomas) and HL have clarified the value of early response assessment with PET. These trials show that PET imaging after 2–3 chemotherapy cycles is far superior to CT-based imaging in predicting progression-free survival and can be at least as reliable as definitive response assessment at the end of therapy. This information is of great potential value to patients, but oncologists should be cautious in the use of early PET response in determining choice of therapy until some critical questions are answered. These include: When is the best time to use PET for response assessment? What is the best methodology, visual or quantitative? (For HL at least, visual reading appears superior to an SUV-based assessment). Can early responders be cured with less intensive therapy? Will survival be better for patients treated more intensively because they have a poor interim metabolic response? In the future, early PET will be crucial in developing response-adapted therapy but without further carefully designed clinical trials, oncologists will remain uncertain how best to use this new information.
format Text
id pubmed-1974859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19748592009-02-28 Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET MacManus, Michael P Seymour, John F Hicks, Rodney J Cancer Imaging Article Early assessment of response to chemotherapy with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is becoming a routine part of management in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Changes in FDG uptake can occur soon after the initiation of therapy and they precede changes in tumour volume. Recent studies in uniform populations of aggressive lymphomas (predominantly diffuse large B cell lymphomas) and HL have clarified the value of early response assessment with PET. These trials show that PET imaging after 2–3 chemotherapy cycles is far superior to CT-based imaging in predicting progression-free survival and can be at least as reliable as definitive response assessment at the end of therapy. This information is of great potential value to patients, but oncologists should be cautious in the use of early PET response in determining choice of therapy until some critical questions are answered. These include: When is the best time to use PET for response assessment? What is the best methodology, visual or quantitative? (For HL at least, visual reading appears superior to an SUV-based assessment). Can early responders be cured with less intensive therapy? Will survival be better for patients treated more intensively because they have a poor interim metabolic response? In the future, early PET will be crucial in developing response-adapted therapy but without further carefully designed clinical trials, oncologists will remain uncertain how best to use this new information. e-Med 2007-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1974859/ /pubmed/17766210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0004 Text en © 2007 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Article
MacManus, Michael P
Seymour, John F
Hicks, Rodney J
Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title_full Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title_fullStr Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title_full_unstemmed Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title_short Overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with FDG-PET
title_sort overview of early response assessment in lymphoma with fdg-pet
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1974859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17766210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0004
work_keys_str_mv AT macmanusmichaelp overviewofearlyresponseassessmentinlymphomawithfdgpet
AT seymourjohnf overviewofearlyresponseassessmentinlymphomawithfdgpet
AT hicksrodneyj overviewofearlyresponseassessmentinlymphomawithfdgpet