Cargando…

When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe

BACKGROUND: Drug-related death (DRD) figures, published by the national performance management framework, are used to monitor the performance of Drug (and Alcohol) Action Teams (D[A]ATs) in England and Wales with respect to reducing DRDs among drug abusers. To date, no investigation has been made in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beynon, Caryl M, Bellis, Mark A, Church, Elaine, Neely, Sue
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17688690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-2-25
_version_ 1782135067759345664
author Beynon, Caryl M
Bellis, Mark A
Church, Elaine
Neely, Sue
author_facet Beynon, Caryl M
Bellis, Mark A
Church, Elaine
Neely, Sue
author_sort Beynon, Caryl M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug-related death (DRD) figures, published by the national performance management framework, are used to monitor the performance of Drug (and Alcohol) Action Teams (D[A]ATs) in England and Wales with respect to reducing DRDs among drug abusers. To date, no investigation has been made into the types of death included in these figures, the demographic and drug profile of those who died, nor the likelihood of individuals included in DRD figures interacting with services designed to assist drug abusers. The aim of this work was to examine the characteristics of deaths classified as drug-related and to explore their applicability to performance-monitor drug-related services. Liverpool was chosen because it was reported by the national DRD monitoring system to have the highest number of DRDs in 2004. METHODS: Information was retrieved from the Liverpool coroner's records and established monitoring systems on individuals reported by the national performance monitoring system as a DRD between 1(st )January 2004 and 30(th )June 2005 (n = 70). Analyses assessed differences between those categorised by the national performance monitoring system as 'drug abusers/dependents' and 'non-drug abusers/dependents' using χ(2), Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U. RESULTS: Non-drug abusers were significantly older (median age 53.59 vs. 38.23), had no recent contact with drug-related agencies (cv. 31.6% of abusers who had treatment contact) and had different post mortem drug profiles than drug abusers. A significantly greater proportion of non-drug abusers died from drug toxicity – predominantly through anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and analgesics. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the national DRD performance monitoring system includes deaths of people who are not drug abusers – individuals who are not the current focus of drug prevention, treatment or harm minimisation services. This raises concerns regarding the applicability of these figures to performance monitor D(A)ATs. Furthermore, using the more compact definitions used to monitor trends in DRDs across England, Wales and Europe fails to include a proportion of deaths attributable to drug misuse – such as those attributable blood-borne viruses. Current definitions used to monitor DRDs locally, nationally and across Europe fail to capture the true burden of drug-related mortality.
format Text
id pubmed-1976310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19763102007-09-13 When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe Beynon, Caryl M Bellis, Mark A Church, Elaine Neely, Sue Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Drug-related death (DRD) figures, published by the national performance management framework, are used to monitor the performance of Drug (and Alcohol) Action Teams (D[A]ATs) in England and Wales with respect to reducing DRDs among drug abusers. To date, no investigation has been made into the types of death included in these figures, the demographic and drug profile of those who died, nor the likelihood of individuals included in DRD figures interacting with services designed to assist drug abusers. The aim of this work was to examine the characteristics of deaths classified as drug-related and to explore their applicability to performance-monitor drug-related services. Liverpool was chosen because it was reported by the national DRD monitoring system to have the highest number of DRDs in 2004. METHODS: Information was retrieved from the Liverpool coroner's records and established monitoring systems on individuals reported by the national performance monitoring system as a DRD between 1(st )January 2004 and 30(th )June 2005 (n = 70). Analyses assessed differences between those categorised by the national performance monitoring system as 'drug abusers/dependents' and 'non-drug abusers/dependents' using χ(2), Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U. RESULTS: Non-drug abusers were significantly older (median age 53.59 vs. 38.23), had no recent contact with drug-related agencies (cv. 31.6% of abusers who had treatment contact) and had different post mortem drug profiles than drug abusers. A significantly greater proportion of non-drug abusers died from drug toxicity – predominantly through anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and analgesics. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the national DRD performance monitoring system includes deaths of people who are not drug abusers – individuals who are not the current focus of drug prevention, treatment or harm minimisation services. This raises concerns regarding the applicability of these figures to performance monitor D(A)ATs. Furthermore, using the more compact definitions used to monitor trends in DRDs across England, Wales and Europe fails to include a proportion of deaths attributable to drug misuse – such as those attributable blood-borne viruses. Current definitions used to monitor DRDs locally, nationally and across Europe fail to capture the true burden of drug-related mortality. BioMed Central 2007-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1976310/ /pubmed/17688690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-2-25 Text en Copyright © 2007 Beynon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Beynon, Caryl M
Bellis, Mark A
Church, Elaine
Neely, Sue
When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title_full When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title_fullStr When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title_full_unstemmed When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title_short When is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? Implications for current drug-related death policies in the UK and Europe
title_sort when is a drug-related death not a drug-related death? implications for current drug-related death policies in the uk and europe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17688690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-2-25
work_keys_str_mv AT beynoncarylm whenisadrugrelateddeathnotadrugrelateddeathimplicationsforcurrentdrugrelateddeathpoliciesintheukandeurope
AT bellismarka whenisadrugrelateddeathnotadrugrelateddeathimplicationsforcurrentdrugrelateddeathpoliciesintheukandeurope
AT churchelaine whenisadrugrelateddeathnotadrugrelateddeathimplicationsforcurrentdrugrelateddeathpoliciesintheukandeurope
AT neelysue whenisadrugrelateddeathnotadrugrelateddeathimplicationsforcurrentdrugrelateddeathpoliciesintheukandeurope