Cargando…

A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.

In this study cell lines have been used to determine the level of correlation between three assays which are in use for in vitro prediction of human tumour chemosensitivity. The methods which were compared included a clonogenic assay, a monolayer assay and a short-term biochemical assay. The results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, A. P., Ford, C. H., Newman, C. E., Howell, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1984
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6197986
_version_ 1782135103863914496
author Wilson, A. P.
Ford, C. H.
Newman, C. E.
Howell, A.
author_facet Wilson, A. P.
Ford, C. H.
Newman, C. E.
Howell, A.
author_sort Wilson, A. P.
collection PubMed
description In this study cell lines have been used to determine the level of correlation between three assays which are in use for in vitro prediction of human tumour chemosensitivity. The methods which were compared included a clonogenic assay, a monolayer assay and a short-term biochemical assay. The results indicated that the monolayer and clonogenic assays were either directly comparable or could be made comparable by reducing the drug exposure time in the monolayer assay. The biochemical assay also gave comparable results for 3 of the 5 drugs tested. It was concluded that although the 3 assays did not produce identical dose-response curves, the assays were equally valid when used for predictive testing because selection of cut-off points which were based on retrospective correlations between in vitro sensitivity data and response data, as established by other authors, compensated for differences in sensitivity between the assays.
format Text
id pubmed-1976673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1984
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19766732009-09-10 A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours. Wilson, A. P. Ford, C. H. Newman, C. E. Howell, A. Br J Cancer Research Article In this study cell lines have been used to determine the level of correlation between three assays which are in use for in vitro prediction of human tumour chemosensitivity. The methods which were compared included a clonogenic assay, a monolayer assay and a short-term biochemical assay. The results indicated that the monolayer and clonogenic assays were either directly comparable or could be made comparable by reducing the drug exposure time in the monolayer assay. The biochemical assay also gave comparable results for 3 of the 5 drugs tested. It was concluded that although the 3 assays did not produce identical dose-response curves, the assays were equally valid when used for predictive testing because selection of cut-off points which were based on retrospective correlations between in vitro sensitivity data and response data, as established by other authors, compensated for differences in sensitivity between the assays. Nature Publishing Group 1984-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1976673/ /pubmed/6197986 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, A. P.
Ford, C. H.
Newman, C. E.
Howell, A.
A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title_full A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title_fullStr A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title_short A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
title_sort comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6197986
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonap acomparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT fordch acomparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT newmance acomparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT howella acomparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT wilsonap comparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT fordch comparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT newmance comparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours
AT howella comparisonofthreeassaysusedfortheinvitrochemosensitivitytestingofhumantumours