Cargando…

The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.

The distribution of labelled cells through 5 different mouse tumours was measured after a single injection of [3H]-thymidine [( 3H]-TdR) or [3H]-deoxyuridine [( 3H]-UdR). All the tumours had areas where the percentage of labelled cells (the labelling index, LI) was high and areas where the LI was ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, E., Dobbin, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1985
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3966970
_version_ 1782135135484772352
author Hamilton, E.
Dobbin, J.
author_facet Hamilton, E.
Dobbin, J.
author_sort Hamilton, E.
collection PubMed
description The distribution of labelled cells through 5 different mouse tumours was measured after a single injection of [3H]-thymidine [( 3H]-TdR) or [3H]-deoxyuridine [( 3H]-UdR). All the tumours had areas where the percentage of labelled cells (the labelling index, LI) was high and areas where the LI was very low. The total area with a low LI was greater after [3H]-TdR than after [3H]-UdR injection in all 5 tumours. In one of the tumours, carcinoma NT, repeated injections of [3H]-UdR at 2 h intervals caused the areas of high LI to spread, eliminating all areas of low LI in many specimens. When 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) was injected, to block de novo DNA synthesis in carcinoma NT, [3H]-TdR was incorporated by many more cells. The LI was increased throughout the tumour and no area had a LI below 20% after FUdR plus [3H]-TdR. After flash-labelling with [3H]-TdR alone, nearly half the tumour had a LI below 20%. We conclude that the labelling seen after FUdR plus [3H]-TdR represented the true distribution of S phase cells in carcinoma NT. Routine flash-labelling with [3H]-TdR or [3H]-UdR left nearly half the S phase cells unlabelled and gave an erroneously low value for the proportion of DNA synthesising cells in the tumour. The results suggest that many tumour cells have very large endogenous nucleotide pools which cannot be flooded by a single injection, even of [3H]-UdR.
format Text
id pubmed-1976826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1985
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19768262009-09-10 The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies. Hamilton, E. Dobbin, J. Br J Cancer Research Article The distribution of labelled cells through 5 different mouse tumours was measured after a single injection of [3H]-thymidine [( 3H]-TdR) or [3H]-deoxyuridine [( 3H]-UdR). All the tumours had areas where the percentage of labelled cells (the labelling index, LI) was high and areas where the LI was very low. The total area with a low LI was greater after [3H]-TdR than after [3H]-UdR injection in all 5 tumours. In one of the tumours, carcinoma NT, repeated injections of [3H]-UdR at 2 h intervals caused the areas of high LI to spread, eliminating all areas of low LI in many specimens. When 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) was injected, to block de novo DNA synthesis in carcinoma NT, [3H]-TdR was incorporated by many more cells. The LI was increased throughout the tumour and no area had a LI below 20% after FUdR plus [3H]-TdR. After flash-labelling with [3H]-TdR alone, nearly half the tumour had a LI below 20%. We conclude that the labelling seen after FUdR plus [3H]-TdR represented the true distribution of S phase cells in carcinoma NT. Routine flash-labelling with [3H]-TdR or [3H]-UdR left nearly half the S phase cells unlabelled and gave an erroneously low value for the proportion of DNA synthesising cells in the tumour. The results suggest that many tumour cells have very large endogenous nucleotide pools which cannot be flooded by a single injection, even of [3H]-UdR. Nature Publishing Group 1985-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1976826/ /pubmed/3966970 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamilton, E.
Dobbin, J.
The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title_full The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title_fullStr The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title_full_unstemmed The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title_short The validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
title_sort validity of the labelling index in tumour studies.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1976826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3966970
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltone thevalidityofthelabellingindexintumourstudies
AT dobbinj thevalidityofthelabellingindexintumourstudies
AT hamiltone validityofthelabellingindexintumourstudies
AT dobbinj validityofthelabellingindexintumourstudies