Cargando…
Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions.
To investigate the influence of culture conditions on the in vitro responses of tumour cells to anticancer drugs, the sensitivities observed with the soft agar methods of Hamburger & Salmon (1977) (H-S) and of Courtenay & Mills (1978) (C-M) were compared. In all cases the ID50 values were de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1985
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4005141 |
_version_ | 1782135185880383488 |
---|---|
author | Endresen, L. Tveit, K. M. Rugstad, H. E. Pihl, A. |
author_facet | Endresen, L. Tveit, K. M. Rugstad, H. E. Pihl, A. |
author_sort | Endresen, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the influence of culture conditions on the in vitro responses of tumour cells to anticancer drugs, the sensitivities observed with the soft agar methods of Hamburger & Salmon (1977) (H-S) and of Courtenay & Mills (1978) (C-M) were compared. In all cases the ID50 values were determined from dose-response curves. Six human tumour cell lines exposed to 10 different agents, and 9 patients' melanomas exposed to 5 different agents, were examined. In the studies of cell lines the H-S method gave higher sensitivity values than the C-M method in 38 out of 52 cases, whereas in 14 cases the results were the same. In the patients' tumours the H-S method gave higher sensitivity in 21 of 35 cases, equal sensitivity in 11, and lower sensitivity in 3 cases. In many instances the ID50 values obtained with the two test systems differed by factors of 10 or more, both in the case of cell lines and tumour specimens. Systematic alterations in the culture conditions indicated that the presence or absence of rat erythrocytes is the most important factor responsible for the differences observed. Also, other factors, such as supplements (in the H-S method) and the use of different serum types, appeared to influence both colony growth and chemosensitivity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1985 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19770772009-09-10 Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. Endresen, L. Tveit, K. M. Rugstad, H. E. Pihl, A. Br J Cancer Research Article To investigate the influence of culture conditions on the in vitro responses of tumour cells to anticancer drugs, the sensitivities observed with the soft agar methods of Hamburger & Salmon (1977) (H-S) and of Courtenay & Mills (1978) (C-M) were compared. In all cases the ID50 values were determined from dose-response curves. Six human tumour cell lines exposed to 10 different agents, and 9 patients' melanomas exposed to 5 different agents, were examined. In the studies of cell lines the H-S method gave higher sensitivity values than the C-M method in 38 out of 52 cases, whereas in 14 cases the results were the same. In the patients' tumours the H-S method gave higher sensitivity in 21 of 35 cases, equal sensitivity in 11, and lower sensitivity in 3 cases. In many instances the ID50 values obtained with the two test systems differed by factors of 10 or more, both in the case of cell lines and tumour specimens. Systematic alterations in the culture conditions indicated that the presence or absence of rat erythrocytes is the most important factor responsible for the differences observed. Also, other factors, such as supplements (in the H-S method) and the use of different serum types, appeared to influence both colony growth and chemosensitivity. Nature Publishing Group 1985-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1977077/ /pubmed/4005141 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Endresen, L. Tveit, K. M. Rugstad, H. E. Pihl, A. Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title | Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title_full | Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title_fullStr | Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title_short | Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
title_sort | chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4005141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT endresenl chemosensitivitymeasurementsofhumantumourcellsbysoftagarassaysareinfluencedbythecultureconditions AT tveitkm chemosensitivitymeasurementsofhumantumourcellsbysoftagarassaysareinfluencedbythecultureconditions AT rugstadhe chemosensitivitymeasurementsofhumantumourcellsbysoftagarassaysareinfluencedbythecultureconditions AT pihla chemosensitivitymeasurementsofhumantumourcellsbysoftagarassaysareinfluencedbythecultureconditions |