Cargando…

A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.

Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slee, P. H., Willemze, R., van Oosterom, A. T., Lurvink, E., van den Berg, L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1985
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4063147
_version_ 1782135214239121408
author Slee, P. H.
Willemze, R.
van Oosterom, A. T.
Lurvink, E.
van den Berg, L.
author_facet Slee, P. H.
Willemze, R.
van Oosterom, A. T.
Lurvink, E.
van den Berg, L.
author_sort Slee, P. H.
collection PubMed
description Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (PE) was 0.156 and 0.147, in the HTCA 0.103 and 0.028%; adequate growth rate in the PCDC-technique was 67% and in the HTCA 38%. Fewer cells were required for plating in the PCDC-technique: 6.4 X 10(4) vs. 2.6 X 10(5) in the HTCA. The mean and median coefficient of variation of the colony numbers in the PCDC-technique appeared much higher: 27.3 and 37.3 vs. 11.2 and 11.1% in the HTCA. The relation between the PEs obtained for the same specimen in the two techniques was compared. No positive correlation was found, which can possibly be ascribed to technical shortcomings in both techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-1977214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1985
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19772142009-09-10 A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. Slee, P. H. Willemze, R. van Oosterom, A. T. Lurvink, E. van den Berg, L. Br J Cancer Research Article Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (PE) was 0.156 and 0.147, in the HTCA 0.103 and 0.028%; adequate growth rate in the PCDC-technique was 67% and in the HTCA 38%. Fewer cells were required for plating in the PCDC-technique: 6.4 X 10(4) vs. 2.6 X 10(5) in the HTCA. The mean and median coefficient of variation of the colony numbers in the PCDC-technique appeared much higher: 27.3 and 37.3 vs. 11.2 and 11.1% in the HTCA. The relation between the PEs obtained for the same specimen in the two techniques was compared. No positive correlation was found, which can possibly be ascribed to technical shortcomings in both techniques. Nature Publishing Group 1985-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1977214/ /pubmed/4063147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slee, P. H.
Willemze, R.
van Oosterom, A. T.
Lurvink, E.
van den Berg, L.
A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title_full A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title_fullStr A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title_short A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
title_sort comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4063147
work_keys_str_mv AT sleeph acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT willemzer acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT vanoosteromat acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT lurvinke acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT vandenbergl acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT sleeph comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT willemzer comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT vanoosteromat comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT lurvinke comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay
AT vandenbergl comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay