Cargando…
A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay.
Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (P...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1985
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4063147 |
_version_ | 1782135214239121408 |
---|---|
author | Slee, P. H. Willemze, R. van Oosterom, A. T. Lurvink, E. van den Berg, L. |
author_facet | Slee, P. H. Willemze, R. van Oosterom, A. T. Lurvink, E. van den Berg, L. |
author_sort | Slee, P. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (PE) was 0.156 and 0.147, in the HTCA 0.103 and 0.028%; adequate growth rate in the PCDC-technique was 67% and in the HTCA 38%. Fewer cells were required for plating in the PCDC-technique: 6.4 X 10(4) vs. 2.6 X 10(5) in the HTCA. The mean and median coefficient of variation of the colony numbers in the PCDC-technique appeared much higher: 27.3 and 37.3 vs. 11.2 and 11.1% in the HTCA. The relation between the PEs obtained for the same specimen in the two techniques was compared. No positive correlation was found, which can possibly be ascribed to technical shortcomings in both techniques. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1985 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19772142009-09-10 A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. Slee, P. H. Willemze, R. van Oosterom, A. T. Lurvink, E. van den Berg, L. Br J Cancer Research Article Twenty-one identical tumour specimens were cultured both in the Plasma-Clot Diffusion Chamber (PCDC) Technique and the Human Tumour Colony-forming Assay (HTCA). The culture results achieved in the PCDC-technique were clearly superior to the HTCA: in the PCDC the mean and median plating efficiency (PE) was 0.156 and 0.147, in the HTCA 0.103 and 0.028%; adequate growth rate in the PCDC-technique was 67% and in the HTCA 38%. Fewer cells were required for plating in the PCDC-technique: 6.4 X 10(4) vs. 2.6 X 10(5) in the HTCA. The mean and median coefficient of variation of the colony numbers in the PCDC-technique appeared much higher: 27.3 and 37.3 vs. 11.2 and 11.1% in the HTCA. The relation between the PEs obtained for the same specimen in the two techniques was compared. No positive correlation was found, which can possibly be ascribed to technical shortcomings in both techniques. Nature Publishing Group 1985-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1977214/ /pubmed/4063147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Slee, P. H. Willemze, R. van Oosterom, A. T. Lurvink, E. van den Berg, L. A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title | A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title_full | A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title_fullStr | A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title_short | A comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
title_sort | comparison of two culture techniques: an in vitro & an in vivo tumour colony-forming assay. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4063147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sleeph acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT willemzer acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT vanoosteromat acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT lurvinke acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT vandenbergl acomparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT sleeph comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT willemzer comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT vanoosteromat comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT lurvinke comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay AT vandenbergl comparisonoftwoculturetechniquesaninvitroaninvivotumourcolonyformingassay |