Cargando…

Randomised trial of epirubicin alone versus 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin C in locally advanced and metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas.

Sixty-nine unselected patients with locally advanced and metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas, who had not received previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were randomised to receive either 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin C (FEM) or epirubicin. Survival was not significantly different in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topham, C., Glees, J., Rawson, N. S., Woods, E. M., Coombes, R. C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1991
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1906726
Descripción
Sumario:Sixty-nine unselected patients with locally advanced and metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas, who had not received previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were randomised to receive either 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin C (FEM) or epirubicin. Survival was not significantly different in the two arms. Toxic reactions (WHO grade greater than 3) in the FEM and epirubicin arm respectively included nausea (2), (4), severe alopecia (1) (3) and leucopenia (1), (5), none of these were statistically significant. We therefore suggest that combination chemotherapy should not be used in preference to single agent chemotherapy as standard treatment for locally advanced or metastatic cancer of the pancreas.