Cargando…
A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid.
Recent clinical trials have suggested that a combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this regimen has been complicated by potentially life threatening toxicity. Regional delivery of folinic ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1992
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1733436 |
_version_ | 1782135244028116992 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, J. H. Kerr, D. J. Setanoians, A. Cooke, T. G. McArdle, C. S. |
author_facet | Anderson, J. H. Kerr, D. J. Setanoians, A. Cooke, T. G. McArdle, C. S. |
author_sort | Anderson, J. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent clinical trials have suggested that a combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this regimen has been complicated by potentially life threatening toxicity. Regional delivery of folinic acid via a hepatic artery catheter might be expected to reduce systemic exposure and subsequent adverse effects. The present study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous and intra-hepatic arterial infusions of folinic acid in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 6) who were being treated with weekly regional infusions of 5-FU. The mean area under the plasma concentration--time curve, the peak plasma concentration and the steady state volume of distribution were 163 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 41), 18.5 micrograms ml-1 (SD 1.2) and 7.41 m-2 (SD 0.44) respectively following intravenous administration of folinic acid compared with 142 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 45), 14.8 micrograms ml-1 (SD 2.4) and 11.21 m-2 (SD 1.22) following intra-hepatic arterial administration (P less than 0.05). Regional folinic acid was therefore associated with a statistically significant reduction in systemic exposure compared with the intravenous route. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1992 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19773542009-09-10 A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. Anderson, J. H. Kerr, D. J. Setanoians, A. Cooke, T. G. McArdle, C. S. Br J Cancer Research Article Recent clinical trials have suggested that a combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this regimen has been complicated by potentially life threatening toxicity. Regional delivery of folinic acid via a hepatic artery catheter might be expected to reduce systemic exposure and subsequent adverse effects. The present study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous and intra-hepatic arterial infusions of folinic acid in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 6) who were being treated with weekly regional infusions of 5-FU. The mean area under the plasma concentration--time curve, the peak plasma concentration and the steady state volume of distribution were 163 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 41), 18.5 micrograms ml-1 (SD 1.2) and 7.41 m-2 (SD 0.44) respectively following intravenous administration of folinic acid compared with 142 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 45), 14.8 micrograms ml-1 (SD 2.4) and 11.21 m-2 (SD 1.22) following intra-hepatic arterial administration (P less than 0.05). Regional folinic acid was therefore associated with a statistically significant reduction in systemic exposure compared with the intravenous route. Nature Publishing Group 1992-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1977354/ /pubmed/1733436 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Anderson, J. H. Kerr, D. J. Setanoians, A. Cooke, T. G. McArdle, C. S. A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title | A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title_full | A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title_fullStr | A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title_full_unstemmed | A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title_short | A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
title_sort | pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1733436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonjh apharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT kerrdj apharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT setanoiansa apharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT cooketg apharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT mcardlecs apharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT andersonjh pharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT kerrdj pharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT setanoiansa pharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT cooketg pharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid AT mcardlecs pharmacokineticcomparisonofintravenousversusintraarterialfolinicacid |