Cargando…

Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.

Following EMS mutagenesis, three estramustine (EM) resistant DU 145 human prostatic carcinoma cell lines were clonally selected by exposure to incrementally increasing concentrations of the drug. Although only low levels of resistance (approximately 3-fold) were attainable, this resistance was stabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speicher, L. A., Sheridan, V. R., Godwin, A. K., Tew, K. D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1991
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1892755
_version_ 1782135280120102912
author Speicher, L. A.
Sheridan, V. R.
Godwin, A. K.
Tew, K. D.
author_facet Speicher, L. A.
Sheridan, V. R.
Godwin, A. K.
Tew, K. D.
author_sort Speicher, L. A.
collection PubMed
description Following EMS mutagenesis, three estramustine (EM) resistant DU 145 human prostatic carcinoma cell lines were clonally selected by exposure to incrementally increasing concentrations of the drug. Although only low levels of resistance (approximately 3-fold) were attainable, this resistance was stable in the absence of continuous drug exposure. These EM-resistant clones (EMR 4,9,12) did not exhibit cross resistance to vinblastine, taxol, or adriamycin, and had collateral sensitivity to cytochalasin B. None of the lines had elevated expression of P-glycoprotein mRNA or glutathione S-transferase activity, suggesting a phenotype distinct from the classic multi-drug resistance phenotype. This conclusion was supported further by the observation that two MDR cell lines (FLC mouse erythroleukaemic and SKOV3 human ovarian carcinoma cells) showed sensitivity to EM. Fluorescent activated cell sorting analysis of the effects of EM on cell cycle traverse revealed that at EM concentrations up to 20 microM an increasing percentage of wild type cells were blocked in G2/M; no such effect occurred in EMR lines. Differential interference contrast microscopy was employed to study EM's effect on mitosis. EMR lines were able to form functional, albeit smaller, spindles at EM concentrations that resulted in chromosomal disorganisation and inhibition of mitotic progression in wild type cells. EMR lines were able to progress through mitosis and cytokinesis at the same rate as untreated cells. Tritiated EM was used to evaluate potential drug uptake/efflux mutations in ERM clones. EMR 4 and 9 incorporate less EM than wild type cells; however, they have significantly decreased cellular volumes. The initial efflux rate constants for EMR clones were greater than for wild type cells. Within 5 min greater than 70% of the drug was lost from resistant cells compared to a 50% loss by the wild type. Although the specific mechanisms of resistance have yet to be defined, the lack of collateral resistance to other MDR/anti-microtubule agents could serve as the basis for the clinical use of EM in combination chemotherapy. IMAGES:
format Text
id pubmed-1977526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1991
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19775262009-09-10 Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype. Speicher, L. A. Sheridan, V. R. Godwin, A. K. Tew, K. D. Br J Cancer Research Article Following EMS mutagenesis, three estramustine (EM) resistant DU 145 human prostatic carcinoma cell lines were clonally selected by exposure to incrementally increasing concentrations of the drug. Although only low levels of resistance (approximately 3-fold) were attainable, this resistance was stable in the absence of continuous drug exposure. These EM-resistant clones (EMR 4,9,12) did not exhibit cross resistance to vinblastine, taxol, or adriamycin, and had collateral sensitivity to cytochalasin B. None of the lines had elevated expression of P-glycoprotein mRNA or glutathione S-transferase activity, suggesting a phenotype distinct from the classic multi-drug resistance phenotype. This conclusion was supported further by the observation that two MDR cell lines (FLC mouse erythroleukaemic and SKOV3 human ovarian carcinoma cells) showed sensitivity to EM. Fluorescent activated cell sorting analysis of the effects of EM on cell cycle traverse revealed that at EM concentrations up to 20 microM an increasing percentage of wild type cells were blocked in G2/M; no such effect occurred in EMR lines. Differential interference contrast microscopy was employed to study EM's effect on mitosis. EMR lines were able to form functional, albeit smaller, spindles at EM concentrations that resulted in chromosomal disorganisation and inhibition of mitotic progression in wild type cells. EMR lines were able to progress through mitosis and cytokinesis at the same rate as untreated cells. Tritiated EM was used to evaluate potential drug uptake/efflux mutations in ERM clones. EMR 4 and 9 incorporate less EM than wild type cells; however, they have significantly decreased cellular volumes. The initial efflux rate constants for EMR clones were greater than for wild type cells. Within 5 min greater than 70% of the drug was lost from resistant cells compared to a 50% loss by the wild type. Although the specific mechanisms of resistance have yet to be defined, the lack of collateral resistance to other MDR/anti-microtubule agents could serve as the basis for the clinical use of EM in combination chemotherapy. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1991-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1977526/ /pubmed/1892755 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Speicher, L. A.
Sheridan, V. R.
Godwin, A. K.
Tew, K. D.
Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title_full Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title_fullStr Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title_short Resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
title_sort resistance to the antimitotic drug estramustine is distinct from the multidrug resistant phenotype.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1892755
work_keys_str_mv AT speicherla resistancetotheantimitoticdrugestramustineisdistinctfromthemultidrugresistantphenotype
AT sheridanvr resistancetotheantimitoticdrugestramustineisdistinctfromthemultidrugresistantphenotype
AT godwinak resistancetotheantimitoticdrugestramustineisdistinctfromthemultidrugresistantphenotype
AT tewkd resistancetotheantimitoticdrugestramustineisdistinctfromthemultidrugresistantphenotype