Cargando…
Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcino...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1992
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1562472 |
_version_ | 1782135287785193472 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, W. M. Hardcastle, J. D. Jackson, J. Pye, G. |
author_facet | Thomas, W. M. Hardcastle, J. D. Jackson, J. Pye, G. |
author_sort | Thomas, W. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1992 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19775592009-09-10 Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. Thomas, W. M. Hardcastle, J. D. Jackson, J. Pye, G. Br J Cancer Research Article An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified. Nature Publishing Group 1992-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1977559/ /pubmed/1562472 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thomas, W. M. Hardcastle, J. D. Jackson, J. Pye, G. Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title | Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title_full | Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title_fullStr | Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title_short | Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
title_sort | chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1562472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomaswm chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients AT hardcastlejd chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients AT jacksonj chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients AT pyeg chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients |