Cargando…

Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.

An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcino...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, W. M., Hardcastle, J. D., Jackson, J., Pye, G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1992
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1562472
_version_ 1782135287785193472
author Thomas, W. M.
Hardcastle, J. D.
Jackson, J.
Pye, G.
author_facet Thomas, W. M.
Hardcastle, J. D.
Jackson, J.
Pye, G.
author_sort Thomas, W. M.
collection PubMed
description An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified.
format Text
id pubmed-1977559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1992
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19775592009-09-10 Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients. Thomas, W. M. Hardcastle, J. D. Jackson, J. Pye, G. Br J Cancer Research Article An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified. Nature Publishing Group 1992-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1977559/ /pubmed/1562472 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, W. M.
Hardcastle, J. D.
Jackson, J.
Pye, G.
Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title_full Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title_fullStr Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title_full_unstemmed Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title_short Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
title_sort chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1562472
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaswm chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients
AT hardcastlejd chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients
AT jacksonj chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients
AT pyeg chemicalandimmunologicaltestingforfaeceloccultbloodacomparisonoftwotestsinsymptomaticpatients