Cargando…
Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy.
This study was aimed at determining whether tumour DNA content measured by cell image analysis could provide additional prognostic information when compared to that provided by flow cytometry. Sections cut from paraffin blocks of tumours from 101 patients with node negative breast cancer were analys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1992
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1348424 |
_version_ | 1782135294131175424 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, J. Hennessy, C. Givan, A. L. Corbett, I. P. Henry, J. A. Sherbet, G. V. Lennard, T. W. |
author_facet | Yuan, J. Hennessy, C. Givan, A. L. Corbett, I. P. Henry, J. A. Sherbet, G. V. Lennard, T. W. |
author_sort | Yuan, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was aimed at determining whether tumour DNA content measured by cell image analysis could provide additional prognostic information when compared to that provided by flow cytometry. Sections cut from paraffin blocks of tumours from 101 patients with node negative breast cancer were analysed by both methods and the results related to other prognostic variables and to patient relapse and overall survival. DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry classified 46 tumours as diploid and 55 as aneuploid, whereas by cell image analysis 30 were diploid and 71 aneuploid (P less than 0.002). There were 20 tumours with discrepancies between the two methods; 18 of these were tumours with only one peak in flow analysis, but determined to be aneuploid with image analysis. DNA content as measured by both methods was significant for predicting relapse and survival by log-rank test, as were tumour histological grade, c-erbB-2 expression and tumour size. Multivariate analysis showed DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry to be the only variable of independent significance (P less than 0.02) for both relapse and overall survival. Compared with cell image analysis, flow cytometry demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of diploid tumours, which may be related to differences in the internal standards applied to each method. We suggest that cell image analysis techniques can provide more sensitive information on the DNA content of tumour cells by direct measurement of nuclear DNA density of both normal lymphocytes and tumour cells in the same section. However, although image analysis appears to be more sensitive than flow cytometry in detecting DNA aneuploidy, the image technique appears to lack the specificity of flow cytometry in correlation with clinical outcome. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1992 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19775882009-09-10 Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. Yuan, J. Hennessy, C. Givan, A. L. Corbett, I. P. Henry, J. A. Sherbet, G. V. Lennard, T. W. Br J Cancer Research Article This study was aimed at determining whether tumour DNA content measured by cell image analysis could provide additional prognostic information when compared to that provided by flow cytometry. Sections cut from paraffin blocks of tumours from 101 patients with node negative breast cancer were analysed by both methods and the results related to other prognostic variables and to patient relapse and overall survival. DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry classified 46 tumours as diploid and 55 as aneuploid, whereas by cell image analysis 30 were diploid and 71 aneuploid (P less than 0.002). There were 20 tumours with discrepancies between the two methods; 18 of these were tumours with only one peak in flow analysis, but determined to be aneuploid with image analysis. DNA content as measured by both methods was significant for predicting relapse and survival by log-rank test, as were tumour histological grade, c-erbB-2 expression and tumour size. Multivariate analysis showed DNA ploidy measured by flow cytometry to be the only variable of independent significance (P less than 0.02) for both relapse and overall survival. Compared with cell image analysis, flow cytometry demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of diploid tumours, which may be related to differences in the internal standards applied to each method. We suggest that cell image analysis techniques can provide more sensitive information on the DNA content of tumour cells by direct measurement of nuclear DNA density of both normal lymphocytes and tumour cells in the same section. However, although image analysis appears to be more sensitive than flow cytometry in detecting DNA aneuploidy, the image technique appears to lack the specificity of flow cytometry in correlation with clinical outcome. Nature Publishing Group 1992-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1977588/ /pubmed/1348424 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yuan, J. Hennessy, C. Givan, A. L. Corbett, I. P. Henry, J. A. Sherbet, G. V. Lennard, T. W. Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title | Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title_full | Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title_fullStr | Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title_short | Predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of DNA ploidy. |
title_sort | predicting outcome for patients with node negative breast cancer: a comparative study of the value of flow cytometry and cell image analysis for determination of dna ploidy. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1348424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanj predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT hennessyc predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT givanal predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT corbettip predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT henryja predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT sherbetgv predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy AT lennardtw predictingoutcomeforpatientswithnodenegativebreastcanceracomparativestudyofthevalueofflowcytometryandcellimageanalysisfordeterminationofdnaploidy |