Cargando…

Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.

Clinico-cytogenetic correlations were assessed in 88 patients with malignant ovarian tumours. Cytogenetic analysis of the primary tumours yielded normal karyotype (N) in 33 patients and abnormal karyotypes (A) in 55 patients. Within the A group, seven tumours had simple abnormalities (AS), i.e., num...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pejovic, T., Himmelmann, A., Heim, S., Mandahl, N., Flodérus, U. M., Furgyik, S., Elmfors, B., Helm, G., Willén, H., Mitelman, F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1992
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1739630
_version_ 1782135324226355200
author Pejovic, T.
Himmelmann, A.
Heim, S.
Mandahl, N.
Flodérus, U. M.
Furgyik, S.
Elmfors, B.
Helm, G.
Willén, H.
Mitelman, F.
author_facet Pejovic, T.
Himmelmann, A.
Heim, S.
Mandahl, N.
Flodérus, U. M.
Furgyik, S.
Elmfors, B.
Helm, G.
Willén, H.
Mitelman, F.
author_sort Pejovic, T.
collection PubMed
description Clinico-cytogenetic correlations were assessed in 88 patients with malignant ovarian tumours. Cytogenetic analysis of the primary tumours yielded normal karyotype (N) in 33 patients and abnormal karyotypes (A) in 55 patients. Within the A group, seven tumours had simple abnormalities (AS), i.e., numerical changes only or a single structural aberration, and 48 had karyotypes with complex aberrations (AC). A correlation analysis between groups N and A revealed that cytogenetic abnormalities were more often found among seropapillary tumours, and that cases with abnormal karyotypes on average were of higher stage and more often had residual tumour mass after initial surgery (P less than 0.05 for all variables). When the three groups N, AS, and AC were compared, they were found to be significantly different with regard not only to the three parameters mentioned above, but now tumour grade also appeared to correlate with karyotypic pattern (P = 0.001), with poorly differentiated tumours having the most complex karyotypes. In a correlation analysis between karyotypic pattern and survival, group A patients had shorter survival than group N (P = 0.049). In the corresponding analysis between groups N, AS, and AC, the differences were also significant (P = 0.039), with shorter survival in group AC than in groups N and AS. Stage, grade, residual tumour after primary surgery, and performance status also correlated with survival time. A multivariate analysis identified abnormal karyotype as being independently associated with short survival in advanced clinical stages (P = 0.030) of ovarian carcinoma. We conclude that cytogenetic analysis of tumour cells may be of clinical value in the assessment of prognosis in patients with malignant ovarian tumours.
format Text
id pubmed-1977727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1992
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19777272009-09-10 Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer. Pejovic, T. Himmelmann, A. Heim, S. Mandahl, N. Flodérus, U. M. Furgyik, S. Elmfors, B. Helm, G. Willén, H. Mitelman, F. Br J Cancer Research Article Clinico-cytogenetic correlations were assessed in 88 patients with malignant ovarian tumours. Cytogenetic analysis of the primary tumours yielded normal karyotype (N) in 33 patients and abnormal karyotypes (A) in 55 patients. Within the A group, seven tumours had simple abnormalities (AS), i.e., numerical changes only or a single structural aberration, and 48 had karyotypes with complex aberrations (AC). A correlation analysis between groups N and A revealed that cytogenetic abnormalities were more often found among seropapillary tumours, and that cases with abnormal karyotypes on average were of higher stage and more often had residual tumour mass after initial surgery (P less than 0.05 for all variables). When the three groups N, AS, and AC were compared, they were found to be significantly different with regard not only to the three parameters mentioned above, but now tumour grade also appeared to correlate with karyotypic pattern (P = 0.001), with poorly differentiated tumours having the most complex karyotypes. In a correlation analysis between karyotypic pattern and survival, group A patients had shorter survival than group N (P = 0.049). In the corresponding analysis between groups N, AS, and AC, the differences were also significant (P = 0.039), with shorter survival in group AC than in groups N and AS. Stage, grade, residual tumour after primary surgery, and performance status also correlated with survival time. A multivariate analysis identified abnormal karyotype as being independently associated with short survival in advanced clinical stages (P = 0.030) of ovarian carcinoma. We conclude that cytogenetic analysis of tumour cells may be of clinical value in the assessment of prognosis in patients with malignant ovarian tumours. Nature Publishing Group 1992-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1977727/ /pubmed/1739630 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pejovic, T.
Himmelmann, A.
Heim, S.
Mandahl, N.
Flodérus, U. M.
Furgyik, S.
Elmfors, B.
Helm, G.
Willén, H.
Mitelman, F.
Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title_full Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title_short Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
title_sort prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1739630
work_keys_str_mv AT pejovict prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT himmelmanna prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT heims prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT mandahln prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT floderusum prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT furgyiks prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT elmforsb prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT helmg prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT willenh prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer
AT mitelmanf prognosticimpactofchromosomeaberrationsinovariancancer