Cargando…

Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.

A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seynaeve, C., Schuller, J., Buser, K., Porteder, H., Van Belle, S., Sevelda, P., Christmann, D., Schmidt, M., Kitchener, H., Paes, D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1992
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1386245
_version_ 1782135366326681600
author Seynaeve, C.
Schuller, J.
Buser, K.
Porteder, H.
Van Belle, S.
Sevelda, P.
Christmann, D.
Schmidt, M.
Kitchener, H.
Paes, D.
author_facet Seynaeve, C.
Schuller, J.
Buser, K.
Porteder, H.
Van Belle, S.
Sevelda, P.
Christmann, D.
Schmidt, M.
Kitchener, H.
Paes, D.
author_sort Seynaeve, C.
collection PubMed
description A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and emesis. One hundred and eighty two patients received a loading dose of 8 mg of ondansetron followed by a 24 h infusion of 1 mg h-1 (group 1); 180 and 173 patients received single doses of 32 mg (group II) and 8 mg (group III) respectively, followed by a 24 h placebo infusion. Complete and major control (less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes) of acute emesis was achieved in 74% of patients in group I, 78% in group II and 74% in group III. Seventy seven per cent of the patients in group I, and 75% of patients in groups II and III respectively experienced no or mild nausea during the 24 h observation period. A retrospective stratification of the efficacy data on the basis of patient gender showed the response rate in females to be significant lower (43% vs 67%; less than 0.001). Ondanestron was well tolerated; mild headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (11% of patients) with a similar incidence in the three groups of patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous dose of 8 mg of ondansetron given prior to chemotherapy is as effective as a 32 mg daily dose given as either a single dose of a continuous infusion in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis.
format Text
id pubmed-1977922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1992
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19779222009-09-10 Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. Seynaeve, C. Schuller, J. Buser, K. Porteder, H. Van Belle, S. Sevelda, P. Christmann, D. Schmidt, M. Kitchener, H. Paes, D. Br J Cancer Research Article A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and emesis. One hundred and eighty two patients received a loading dose of 8 mg of ondansetron followed by a 24 h infusion of 1 mg h-1 (group 1); 180 and 173 patients received single doses of 32 mg (group II) and 8 mg (group III) respectively, followed by a 24 h placebo infusion. Complete and major control (less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes) of acute emesis was achieved in 74% of patients in group I, 78% in group II and 74% in group III. Seventy seven per cent of the patients in group I, and 75% of patients in groups II and III respectively experienced no or mild nausea during the 24 h observation period. A retrospective stratification of the efficacy data on the basis of patient gender showed the response rate in females to be significant lower (43% vs 67%; less than 0.001). Ondanestron was well tolerated; mild headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (11% of patients) with a similar incidence in the three groups of patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous dose of 8 mg of ondansetron given prior to chemotherapy is as effective as a 32 mg daily dose given as either a single dose of a continuous infusion in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis. Nature Publishing Group 1992-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1977922/ /pubmed/1386245 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seynaeve, C.
Schuller, J.
Buser, K.
Porteder, H.
Van Belle, S.
Sevelda, P.
Christmann, D.
Schmidt, M.
Kitchener, H.
Paes, D.
Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title_full Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title_fullStr Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title_short Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
title_sort comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. ondansetron study group.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1386245
work_keys_str_mv AT seynaevec comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT schullerj comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT buserk comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT portederh comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT vanbelles comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT seveldap comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT christmannd comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT schmidtm comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT kitchenerh comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup
AT paesd comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup