Cargando…
Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group.
A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1992
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1386245 |
_version_ | 1782135366326681600 |
---|---|
author | Seynaeve, C. Schuller, J. Buser, K. Porteder, H. Van Belle, S. Sevelda, P. Christmann, D. Schmidt, M. Kitchener, H. Paes, D. |
author_facet | Seynaeve, C. Schuller, J. Buser, K. Porteder, H. Van Belle, S. Sevelda, P. Christmann, D. Schmidt, M. Kitchener, H. Paes, D. |
author_sort | Seynaeve, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and emesis. One hundred and eighty two patients received a loading dose of 8 mg of ondansetron followed by a 24 h infusion of 1 mg h-1 (group 1); 180 and 173 patients received single doses of 32 mg (group II) and 8 mg (group III) respectively, followed by a 24 h placebo infusion. Complete and major control (less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes) of acute emesis was achieved in 74% of patients in group I, 78% in group II and 74% in group III. Seventy seven per cent of the patients in group I, and 75% of patients in groups II and III respectively experienced no or mild nausea during the 24 h observation period. A retrospective stratification of the efficacy data on the basis of patient gender showed the response rate in females to be significant lower (43% vs 67%; less than 0.001). Ondanestron was well tolerated; mild headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (11% of patients) with a similar incidence in the three groups of patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous dose of 8 mg of ondansetron given prior to chemotherapy is as effective as a 32 mg daily dose given as either a single dose of a continuous infusion in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1977922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1992 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19779222009-09-10 Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. Seynaeve, C. Schuller, J. Buser, K. Porteder, H. Van Belle, S. Sevelda, P. Christmann, D. Schmidt, M. Kitchener, H. Paes, D. Br J Cancer Research Article A total of 535 chemotherapy naive, hospitalised patients (263 male/272 female) scheduled to receive cisplatin (50-120 mg m-2)-containing regimens participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three intravenous dose schedules of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and emesis. One hundred and eighty two patients received a loading dose of 8 mg of ondansetron followed by a 24 h infusion of 1 mg h-1 (group 1); 180 and 173 patients received single doses of 32 mg (group II) and 8 mg (group III) respectively, followed by a 24 h placebo infusion. Complete and major control (less than or equal to 2 emetic episodes) of acute emesis was achieved in 74% of patients in group I, 78% in group II and 74% in group III. Seventy seven per cent of the patients in group I, and 75% of patients in groups II and III respectively experienced no or mild nausea during the 24 h observation period. A retrospective stratification of the efficacy data on the basis of patient gender showed the response rate in females to be significant lower (43% vs 67%; less than 0.001). Ondanestron was well tolerated; mild headache was the most commonly reported adverse event (11% of patients) with a similar incidence in the three groups of patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous dose of 8 mg of ondansetron given prior to chemotherapy is as effective as a 32 mg daily dose given as either a single dose of a continuous infusion in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis. Nature Publishing Group 1992-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1977922/ /pubmed/1386245 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seynaeve, C. Schuller, J. Buser, K. Porteder, H. Van Belle, S. Sevelda, P. Christmann, D. Schmidt, M. Kitchener, H. Paes, D. Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title | Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title_full | Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title_short | Comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. Ondansetron Study Group. |
title_sort | comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of different doses of ondansetron, given as either a continuous infusion or a single intravenous dose, in acute cisplatin-induced emesis. a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study. ondansetron study group. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1386245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seynaevec comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT schullerj comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT buserk comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT portederh comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT vanbelles comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT seveldap comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT christmannd comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT schmidtm comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT kitchenerh comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup AT paesd comparisonoftheantiemeticefficacyofdifferentdosesofondansetrongivenaseitheracontinuousinfusionorasingleintravenousdoseinacutecisplatininducedemesisamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedparallelgroupstudyondansetronstudygroup |