Cargando…

Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial

BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dodd, Jodie M, Crowther, Caroline A, Hiller, Janet E, Haslam, Ross R, Robinson, Jeffrey S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1988834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17
_version_ 1782135429788598272
author Dodd, Jodie M
Crowther, Caroline A
Hiller, Janet E
Haslam, Ross R
Robinson, Jeffrey S
author_facet Dodd, Jodie M
Crowther, Caroline A
Hiller, Janet E
Haslam, Ross R
Robinson, Jeffrey S
author_sort Dodd, Jodie M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies. The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Multicentred patient preference study and a randomised clinical trial. Inclusion Criteria: Women with a single prior caesarean presenting in their next pregnancy with a single, live fetus in cephalic presentation, who have reached 37 weeks gestation, and who do not have a contraindication to a planned VBAC. Trial Entry & Randomisation: Eligible women will be given an information sheet during pregnancy, and will be recruited to the study from 37 weeks gestation after an obstetrician has confirmed eligibility for a planned vaginal birth. Written informed consent will be obtained. Women who consent to the patient preference study will be allocated their preference for either planned VBAC or planned, elective repeat caesarean. Women who consent to the randomised trial will be randomly allocated to either the planned vaginal birth after caesarean or planned elective repeat caesarean group. Treatment Groups: Women in the planned vaginal birth group will await spontaneous onset of labour whilst appropriate. Women in the elective repeat caesarean group will have this scheduled for between 38 and 40 weeks. Primary Study Outcome: Serious adverse infant outcome (death or serious morbidity). Sample Size: 2314 women in the patient preference study to show a difference in adverse neonatal outcome from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.05, 80% power). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN5397431
format Text
id pubmed-1988834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19888342007-09-21 Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial Dodd, Jodie M Crowther, Caroline A Hiller, Janet E Haslam, Ross R Robinson, Jeffrey S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies. The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Multicentred patient preference study and a randomised clinical trial. Inclusion Criteria: Women with a single prior caesarean presenting in their next pregnancy with a single, live fetus in cephalic presentation, who have reached 37 weeks gestation, and who do not have a contraindication to a planned VBAC. Trial Entry & Randomisation: Eligible women will be given an information sheet during pregnancy, and will be recruited to the study from 37 weeks gestation after an obstetrician has confirmed eligibility for a planned vaginal birth. Written informed consent will be obtained. Women who consent to the patient preference study will be allocated their preference for either planned VBAC or planned, elective repeat caesarean. Women who consent to the randomised trial will be randomly allocated to either the planned vaginal birth after caesarean or planned elective repeat caesarean group. Treatment Groups: Women in the planned vaginal birth group will await spontaneous onset of labour whilst appropriate. Women in the elective repeat caesarean group will have this scheduled for between 38 and 40 weeks. Primary Study Outcome: Serious adverse infant outcome (death or serious morbidity). Sample Size: 2314 women in the patient preference study to show a difference in adverse neonatal outcome from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.05, 80% power). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN5397431 BioMed Central 2007-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1988834/ /pubmed/17697343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17 Text en Copyright © 2007 Dodd et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dodd, Jodie M
Crowther, Caroline A
Hiller, Janet E
Haslam, Ross R
Robinson, Jeffrey S
Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title_full Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title_fullStr Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title_short Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
title_sort birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1988834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17
work_keys_str_mv AT doddjodiem birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial
AT crowthercarolinea birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial
AT hillerjanete birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial
AT haslamrossr birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial
AT robinsonjeffreys birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial