Cargando…
Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1988834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17 |
_version_ | 1782135429788598272 |
---|---|
author | Dodd, Jodie M Crowther, Caroline A Hiller, Janet E Haslam, Ross R Robinson, Jeffrey S |
author_facet | Dodd, Jodie M Crowther, Caroline A Hiller, Janet E Haslam, Ross R Robinson, Jeffrey S |
author_sort | Dodd, Jodie M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies. The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Multicentred patient preference study and a randomised clinical trial. Inclusion Criteria: Women with a single prior caesarean presenting in their next pregnancy with a single, live fetus in cephalic presentation, who have reached 37 weeks gestation, and who do not have a contraindication to a planned VBAC. Trial Entry & Randomisation: Eligible women will be given an information sheet during pregnancy, and will be recruited to the study from 37 weeks gestation after an obstetrician has confirmed eligibility for a planned vaginal birth. Written informed consent will be obtained. Women who consent to the patient preference study will be allocated their preference for either planned VBAC or planned, elective repeat caesarean. Women who consent to the randomised trial will be randomly allocated to either the planned vaginal birth after caesarean or planned elective repeat caesarean group. Treatment Groups: Women in the planned vaginal birth group will await spontaneous onset of labour whilst appropriate. Women in the elective repeat caesarean group will have this scheduled for between 38 and 40 weeks. Primary Study Outcome: Serious adverse infant outcome (death or serious morbidity). Sample Size: 2314 women in the patient preference study to show a difference in adverse neonatal outcome from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.05, 80% power). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN5397431 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1988834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19888342007-09-21 Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial Dodd, Jodie M Crowther, Caroline A Hiller, Janet E Haslam, Ross R Robinson, Jeffrey S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: For women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies. The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Multicentred patient preference study and a randomised clinical trial. Inclusion Criteria: Women with a single prior caesarean presenting in their next pregnancy with a single, live fetus in cephalic presentation, who have reached 37 weeks gestation, and who do not have a contraindication to a planned VBAC. Trial Entry & Randomisation: Eligible women will be given an information sheet during pregnancy, and will be recruited to the study from 37 weeks gestation after an obstetrician has confirmed eligibility for a planned vaginal birth. Written informed consent will be obtained. Women who consent to the patient preference study will be allocated their preference for either planned VBAC or planned, elective repeat caesarean. Women who consent to the randomised trial will be randomly allocated to either the planned vaginal birth after caesarean or planned elective repeat caesarean group. Treatment Groups: Women in the planned vaginal birth group will await spontaneous onset of labour whilst appropriate. Women in the elective repeat caesarean group will have this scheduled for between 38 and 40 weeks. Primary Study Outcome: Serious adverse infant outcome (death or serious morbidity). Sample Size: 2314 women in the patient preference study to show a difference in adverse neonatal outcome from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.05, 80% power). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN5397431 BioMed Central 2007-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1988834/ /pubmed/17697343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17 Text en Copyright © 2007 Dodd et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dodd, Jodie M Crowther, Caroline A Hiller, Janet E Haslam, Ross R Robinson, Jeffrey S Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title | Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title_full | Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title_short | Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
title_sort | birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1988834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doddjodiem birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial AT crowthercarolinea birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial AT hillerjanete birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial AT haslamrossr birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial AT robinsonjeffreys birthaftercaesareanstudyplannedvaginalbirthorplannedelectiverepeatcaesareanforwomenattermwithasinglepreviouscaesareanbirthprotocolforapatientpreferencestudyandrandomisedtrial |