Cargando…
Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the most appropriate treatment for high-risk superficial (stage T1; grade G3) bladder cancer. Immediate cystectomy offers the best chance for survival but may be associated with an impaired quality of life compared with conservative therapy. We estimated life exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1989749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17896857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284 |
_version_ | 1782135438478147584 |
---|---|
author | Kulkarni, Girish S Finelli, Antonio Fleshner, Neil E Jewett, Michael A. S Lopushinsky, Steven R Alibhai, Shabbir M. H |
author_facet | Kulkarni, Girish S Finelli, Antonio Fleshner, Neil E Jewett, Michael A. S Lopushinsky, Steven R Alibhai, Shabbir M. H |
author_sort | Kulkarni, Girish S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the most appropriate treatment for high-risk superficial (stage T1; grade G3) bladder cancer. Immediate cystectomy offers the best chance for survival but may be associated with an impaired quality of life compared with conservative therapy. We estimated life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for both of these treatments for men and women of different ages and comorbidity levels. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We evaluated two treatment strategies for high-risk, T1G3 bladder cancer using a decision-analytic Markov model: (1) Immediate cystectomy with neobladder creation versus (2) conservative management with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and delayed cystectomy in individuals with resistant or progressive disease. Probabilities and utilities were derived from published literature where available, and otherwise from expert opinion. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify variables most likely to influence the decision. Structural sensitivity analyses modifying the base case definition and the triggers for cystectomy in the conservative therapy arm were also explored. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to assess the joint uncertainty of all variables simultaneously and the uncertainty in the base case results. External validation of model outputs was performed by comparing model-predicted survival rates with independent published literature. The mean LE of a 60-y-old male was 14.3 y for immediate cystectomy and 13.6 y with conservative management. With the addition of utilities, the immediate cystectomy strategy yielded a mean QALE of 12.32 y and remained preferred over conservative therapy by 0.35 y. Worsening patient comorbidity diminished the benefit of early cystectomy but altered the LE-based preferred treatment only for patients over age 70 y and the QALE-based preferred treatment for patients over age 65 y. Sensitivity analyses revealed that patients over the age of 70 y or those strongly averse to loss of sexual function, gastrointestinal dysfunction, or life without a bladder have a higher QALE with conservative therapy. The results of structural or probabilistic sensitivity analyses did not change the preferred treatment option. Model-predicted overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar to those reported in published studies, suggesting external validity. CONCLUSIONS: Our model is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind in bladder cancer, and demonstrated that younger patients with high-risk T1G3 bladder had a higher LE and QALE with immediate cystectomy. The decision to pursue immediate cystectomy versus conservative therapy should be based on discussions that consider patient age, comorbid status, and an individual's preference for particular postcystectomy health states. Patients over the age of 70 y or those who place high value on sexual function, gastrointestinal function, or bladder preservation may benefit from a more conservative initial therapeutic approach. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1989749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19897492007-09-22 Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis Kulkarni, Girish S Finelli, Antonio Fleshner, Neil E Jewett, Michael A. S Lopushinsky, Steven R Alibhai, Shabbir M. H PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the most appropriate treatment for high-risk superficial (stage T1; grade G3) bladder cancer. Immediate cystectomy offers the best chance for survival but may be associated with an impaired quality of life compared with conservative therapy. We estimated life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for both of these treatments for men and women of different ages and comorbidity levels. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We evaluated two treatment strategies for high-risk, T1G3 bladder cancer using a decision-analytic Markov model: (1) Immediate cystectomy with neobladder creation versus (2) conservative management with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and delayed cystectomy in individuals with resistant or progressive disease. Probabilities and utilities were derived from published literature where available, and otherwise from expert opinion. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify variables most likely to influence the decision. Structural sensitivity analyses modifying the base case definition and the triggers for cystectomy in the conservative therapy arm were also explored. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to assess the joint uncertainty of all variables simultaneously and the uncertainty in the base case results. External validation of model outputs was performed by comparing model-predicted survival rates with independent published literature. The mean LE of a 60-y-old male was 14.3 y for immediate cystectomy and 13.6 y with conservative management. With the addition of utilities, the immediate cystectomy strategy yielded a mean QALE of 12.32 y and remained preferred over conservative therapy by 0.35 y. Worsening patient comorbidity diminished the benefit of early cystectomy but altered the LE-based preferred treatment only for patients over age 70 y and the QALE-based preferred treatment for patients over age 65 y. Sensitivity analyses revealed that patients over the age of 70 y or those strongly averse to loss of sexual function, gastrointestinal dysfunction, or life without a bladder have a higher QALE with conservative therapy. The results of structural or probabilistic sensitivity analyses did not change the preferred treatment option. Model-predicted overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar to those reported in published studies, suggesting external validity. CONCLUSIONS: Our model is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind in bladder cancer, and demonstrated that younger patients with high-risk T1G3 bladder had a higher LE and QALE with immediate cystectomy. The decision to pursue immediate cystectomy versus conservative therapy should be based on discussions that consider patient age, comorbid status, and an individual's preference for particular postcystectomy health states. Patients over the age of 70 y or those who place high value on sexual function, gastrointestinal function, or bladder preservation may benefit from a more conservative initial therapeutic approach. Public Library of Science 2007-09 2007-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1989749/ /pubmed/17896857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284 Text en © 2007 Kulkarni et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kulkarni, Girish S Finelli, Antonio Fleshner, Neil E Jewett, Michael A. S Lopushinsky, Steven R Alibhai, Shabbir M. H Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title | Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title_full | Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title_fullStr | Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title_short | Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision Analysis |
title_sort | optimal management of high-risk t1g3 bladder cancer: a decision analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1989749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17896857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulkarnigirishs optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis AT finelliantonio optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis AT fleshnerneile optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis AT jewettmichaelas optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis AT lopushinskystevenr optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis AT alibhaishabbirmh optimalmanagementofhighriskt1g3bladdercanceradecisionanalysis |