Cargando…
A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91 |
_version_ | 1782135503323136000 |
---|---|
author | Funahashi, Kimihiko Koike, Junichi Saito, Naoyasu Shiokawa, Hiroyuki Shirasaka, Kentaro Teramoto, Tatsuo |
author_facet | Funahashi, Kimihiko Koike, Junichi Saito, Naoyasu Shiokawa, Hiroyuki Shirasaka, Kentaro Teramoto, Tatsuo |
author_sort | Funahashi, Kimihiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man underwent radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. However, anastomotic recurrence developed three times during three years and six months after the initial operation in spite of irrigation with 5% povidone-iodine before anastomosis. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level had been within normal limits after sigmoidectomy. Finally, the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection. The clinico-pathological findings revealed that possible tumor cell implantation caused these anastomotic recurrences. The patients survived without recurrence during the follow-up period of seven years and nine months. CONCLUSION: We experienced a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to possible tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer; however the prognosis was ultimately very good. CEA monitoring was insensitive for detection of anastomotic recurrence in this case. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1994957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-19949572007-09-28 A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer Funahashi, Kimihiko Koike, Junichi Saito, Naoyasu Shiokawa, Hiroyuki Shirasaka, Kentaro Teramoto, Tatsuo World J Surg Oncol Case Report BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man underwent radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. However, anastomotic recurrence developed three times during three years and six months after the initial operation in spite of irrigation with 5% povidone-iodine before anastomosis. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level had been within normal limits after sigmoidectomy. Finally, the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection. The clinico-pathological findings revealed that possible tumor cell implantation caused these anastomotic recurrences. The patients survived without recurrence during the follow-up period of seven years and nine months. CONCLUSION: We experienced a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to possible tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer; however the prognosis was ultimately very good. CEA monitoring was insensitive for detection of anastomotic recurrence in this case. BioMed Central 2007-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1994957/ /pubmed/17683596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91 Text en Copyright © 2007 Funahashi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Funahashi, Kimihiko Koike, Junichi Saito, Naoyasu Shiokawa, Hiroyuki Shirasaka, Kentaro Teramoto, Tatsuo A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title | A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title_full | A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title_fullStr | A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title_short | A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
title_sort | rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT funahashikimihiko ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT koikejunichi ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT saitonaoyasu ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT shiokawahiroyuki ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT shirasakakentaro ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT teramototatsuo ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT funahashikimihiko rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT koikejunichi rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT saitonaoyasu rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT shiokawahiroyuki rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT shirasakakentaro rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer AT teramototatsuo rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer |