Cargando…

A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funahashi, Kimihiko, Koike, Junichi, Saito, Naoyasu, Shiokawa, Hiroyuki, Shirasaka, Kentaro, Teramoto, Tatsuo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91
_version_ 1782135503323136000
author Funahashi, Kimihiko
Koike, Junichi
Saito, Naoyasu
Shiokawa, Hiroyuki
Shirasaka, Kentaro
Teramoto, Tatsuo
author_facet Funahashi, Kimihiko
Koike, Junichi
Saito, Naoyasu
Shiokawa, Hiroyuki
Shirasaka, Kentaro
Teramoto, Tatsuo
author_sort Funahashi, Kimihiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man underwent radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. However, anastomotic recurrence developed three times during three years and six months after the initial operation in spite of irrigation with 5% povidone-iodine before anastomosis. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level had been within normal limits after sigmoidectomy. Finally, the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection. The clinico-pathological findings revealed that possible tumor cell implantation caused these anastomotic recurrences. The patients survived without recurrence during the follow-up period of seven years and nine months. CONCLUSION: We experienced a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to possible tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer; however the prognosis was ultimately very good. CEA monitoring was insensitive for detection of anastomotic recurrence in this case.
format Text
id pubmed-1994957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-19949572007-09-28 A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer Funahashi, Kimihiko Koike, Junichi Saito, Naoyasu Shiokawa, Hiroyuki Shirasaka, Kentaro Teramoto, Tatsuo World J Surg Oncol Case Report BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is often experienced at colocolic or colorectal anastomoses. Tumor cell implantation has been reported as the mechanism of anastomotic recurrence. However, anastomotic recurrence occurring repeatedly after curative surgery is rare. We herein report a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man underwent radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. However, anastomotic recurrence developed three times during three years and six months after the initial operation in spite of irrigation with 5% povidone-iodine before anastomosis. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level had been within normal limits after sigmoidectomy. Finally, the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection. The clinico-pathological findings revealed that possible tumor cell implantation caused these anastomotic recurrences. The patients survived without recurrence during the follow-up period of seven years and nine months. CONCLUSION: We experienced a rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to possible tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer; however the prognosis was ultimately very good. CEA monitoring was insensitive for detection of anastomotic recurrence in this case. BioMed Central 2007-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1994957/ /pubmed/17683596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91 Text en Copyright © 2007 Funahashi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Funahashi, Kimihiko
Koike, Junichi
Saito, Naoyasu
Shiokawa, Hiroyuki
Shirasaka, Kentaro
Teramoto, Tatsuo
A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title_full A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title_fullStr A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title_short A rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
title_sort rare case of repeated anastomotic recurrence due to tumor implantation after curative surgery for sigmoid colon cancer
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-91
work_keys_str_mv AT funahashikimihiko ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT koikejunichi ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT saitonaoyasu ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT shiokawahiroyuki ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT shirasakakentaro ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT teramototatsuo ararecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT funahashikimihiko rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT koikejunichi rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT saitonaoyasu rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT shiokawahiroyuki rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT shirasakakentaro rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer
AT teramototatsuo rarecaseofrepeatedanastomoticrecurrenceduetotumorimplantationaftercurativesurgeryforsigmoidcoloncancer