Cargando…
Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of app...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2002068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47 |
_version_ | 1782135692044795904 |
---|---|
author | Drumm, Mitchell L |
author_facet | Drumm, Mitchell L |
author_sort | Drumm, Mitchell L |
collection | PubMed |
description | The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of approaches. 'Candidate gene' strategies have consequently become widespread, probably in part due to the inherent similarity to clinical association studies. Such studies in cystic fibrosis have found tantalizing results in genes involved in infection and inflammation, but many other relevant pathways remain untapped. Genome scanning approaches may eventually uncover genes not currently recognized as important to cystic fibrosis. In the meantime, while thousands of polymorphisms are cataloged and other genomic resources become more available, the number of association studies with candidate genes will no doubt increase. To make sense of these studies, the choice of gene and phenotype must be carefully considered. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2002068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20020682007-10-10 Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis Drumm, Mitchell L Respir Res Commentary The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of approaches. 'Candidate gene' strategies have consequently become widespread, probably in part due to the inherent similarity to clinical association studies. Such studies in cystic fibrosis have found tantalizing results in genes involved in infection and inflammation, but many other relevant pathways remain untapped. Genome scanning approaches may eventually uncover genes not currently recognized as important to cystic fibrosis. In the meantime, while thousands of polymorphisms are cataloged and other genomic resources become more available, the number of association studies with candidate genes will no doubt increase. To make sense of these studies, the choice of gene and phenotype must be carefully considered. BioMed Central 2001 2001-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2002068/ /pubmed/11686874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Drumm, Mitchell L Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title | Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title_full | Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title_fullStr | Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title_short | Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
title_sort | modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2002068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drummmitchelll modifiergenesandvariationincysticfibrosis |