Cargando…

Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis

The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Drumm, Mitchell L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2002068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47
_version_ 1782135692044795904
author Drumm, Mitchell L
author_facet Drumm, Mitchell L
author_sort Drumm, Mitchell L
collection PubMed
description The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of approaches. 'Candidate gene' strategies have consequently become widespread, probably in part due to the inherent similarity to clinical association studies. Such studies in cystic fibrosis have found tantalizing results in genes involved in infection and inflammation, but many other relevant pathways remain untapped. Genome scanning approaches may eventually uncover genes not currently recognized as important to cystic fibrosis. In the meantime, while thousands of polymorphisms are cataloged and other genomic resources become more available, the number of association studies with candidate genes will no doubt increase. To make sense of these studies, the choice of gene and phenotype must be carefully considered.
format Text
id pubmed-2002068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20020682007-10-10 Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis Drumm, Mitchell L Respir Res Commentary The availability of molecular tools to carry out genotyping has led to a flurry of association studies between specific genes and clinical indices of disease or disease susceptibility. Human studies, for the most part, have a limited number of subjects available, precluding whole genome types of approaches. 'Candidate gene' strategies have consequently become widespread, probably in part due to the inherent similarity to clinical association studies. Such studies in cystic fibrosis have found tantalizing results in genes involved in infection and inflammation, but many other relevant pathways remain untapped. Genome scanning approaches may eventually uncover genes not currently recognized as important to cystic fibrosis. In the meantime, while thousands of polymorphisms are cataloged and other genomic resources become more available, the number of association studies with candidate genes will no doubt increase. To make sense of these studies, the choice of gene and phenotype must be carefully considered. BioMed Central 2001 2001-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2002068/ /pubmed/11686874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Drumm, Mitchell L
Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title_full Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title_fullStr Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title_short Modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
title_sort modifier genes and variation in cystic fibrosis
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2002068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/rr47
work_keys_str_mv AT drummmitchelll modifiergenesandvariationincysticfibrosis