Cargando…

Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.

The well known associations of breast cancer with fertility patterns and diet are interdependent and it is difficult to estimate the extent to which breast cancer is related to diet. This was attempted by analysing breast cancer rates in populations of single (never married) women for which the cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hems, G., Stuart, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1975
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1156503
_version_ 1782136099983851520
author Hems, G.
Stuart, A.
author_facet Hems, G.
Stuart, A.
author_sort Hems, G.
collection PubMed
description The well known associations of breast cancer with fertility patterns and diet are interdependent and it is difficult to estimate the extent to which breast cancer is related to diet. This was attempted by analysing breast cancer rates in populations of single (never married) women for which the contribution of childbearing would be small. Age specific breast cancer rates for single women showed the same variation by country, social class, urban-rural area and with time, as did the corresponding rates for married women, suggesting that common or related factors determined breast cancer rates in single and married women. Also, dietary correlations of breast cancer rates at 55-64 years, around 1960, were not sifnificantly different for single women and the general female population. This supported the view that the dietary associations with breast cancer, observed in larger studies of general female populations, did not arise indirectly from an association with childbearing rates. It was pointed our that the positive association of breast cancer with sugar, observed for single and for all women, was accopanied by a negative association with starch. These opposite associations with two forms of varbohydrate seemed inconsistent on general nutritional grounds and could be explained as arising indirectly to the association of breast cancer with affluence. Otherwise, it would seem necessary to establish a nutritional difference between starch and sugar, which could reasonably influence breast cancer rates, before the association was accepted as indicating cause.
format Text
id pubmed-2009363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1975
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20093632009-09-10 Breast cancer rates in populations of single women. Hems, G. Stuart, A. Br J Cancer Research Article The well known associations of breast cancer with fertility patterns and diet are interdependent and it is difficult to estimate the extent to which breast cancer is related to diet. This was attempted by analysing breast cancer rates in populations of single (never married) women for which the contribution of childbearing would be small. Age specific breast cancer rates for single women showed the same variation by country, social class, urban-rural area and with time, as did the corresponding rates for married women, suggesting that common or related factors determined breast cancer rates in single and married women. Also, dietary correlations of breast cancer rates at 55-64 years, around 1960, were not sifnificantly different for single women and the general female population. This supported the view that the dietary associations with breast cancer, observed in larger studies of general female populations, did not arise indirectly from an association with childbearing rates. It was pointed our that the positive association of breast cancer with sugar, observed for single and for all women, was accopanied by a negative association with starch. These opposite associations with two forms of varbohydrate seemed inconsistent on general nutritional grounds and could be explained as arising indirectly to the association of breast cancer with affluence. Otherwise, it would seem necessary to establish a nutritional difference between starch and sugar, which could reasonably influence breast cancer rates, before the association was accepted as indicating cause. Nature Publishing Group 1975-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2009363/ /pubmed/1156503 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hems, G.
Stuart, A.
Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title_full Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title_fullStr Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title_short Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
title_sort breast cancer rates in populations of single women.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1156503
work_keys_str_mv AT hemsg breastcancerratesinpopulationsofsinglewomen
AT stuarta breastcancerratesinpopulationsofsinglewomen