Cargando…
Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour.
The effect of successive inocula of tumour cells given to rats at intervals of 1 to 10 days was examined. If W256 cells were injected on both occasions, the second inoculum failed to grow if given into the footpad as early as 1 day, or intravenously as soon as 4 days, after the first administration....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1978
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/619961 |
_version_ | 1782136128770408448 |
---|---|
author | van der Gaag, R. McCullagh, P. |
author_facet | van der Gaag, R. McCullagh, P. |
author_sort | van der Gaag, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of successive inocula of tumour cells given to rats at intervals of 1 to 10 days was examined. If W256 cells were injected on both occasions, the second inoculum failed to grow if given into the footpad as early as 1 day, or intravenously as soon as 4 days, after the first administration. However, although a second inoculum failed to grow, it produced significant augmentation of the growth of the primary implant if given during its latent or growth phases. If the second inoculum contained cells from a fibrosarcoma unrelated to W256, its growth was effectively curtailed if the initial inoculum had preceded it by 24 h or more. However, secondary inocula of fibrosarcoma cells did not augment the growth of the primary W256 tumour. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2009507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1978 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20095072009-09-10 Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. van der Gaag, R. McCullagh, P. Br J Cancer Research Article The effect of successive inocula of tumour cells given to rats at intervals of 1 to 10 days was examined. If W256 cells were injected on both occasions, the second inoculum failed to grow if given into the footpad as early as 1 day, or intravenously as soon as 4 days, after the first administration. However, although a second inoculum failed to grow, it produced significant augmentation of the growth of the primary implant if given during its latent or growth phases. If the second inoculum contained cells from a fibrosarcoma unrelated to W256, its growth was effectively curtailed if the initial inoculum had preceded it by 24 h or more. However, secondary inocula of fibrosarcoma cells did not augment the growth of the primary W256 tumour. Nature Publishing Group 1978-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2009507/ /pubmed/619961 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Gaag, R. McCullagh, P. Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title | Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title_full | Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title_fullStr | Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title_short | Influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
title_sort | influence of secondary inoculum of tumour cells on growth of primary tumour. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/619961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandergaagr influenceofsecondaryinoculumoftumourcellsongrowthofprimarytumour AT mccullaghp influenceofsecondaryinoculumoftumourcellsongrowthofprimarytumour |