Cargando…

Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts

The effects of one large single dose of 5-fluorouracil (FU) have been compared to the same amount given in divided doses daily over a 3- or 5-day period. Comparison of the effects of single vs fractionated dosage was made on 2 types of experimental solid tumour with different growth, cell kinetic, h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looney, W. B., MacLeod, M. S., Hopkins, H. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1978
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/207298
_version_ 1782136154668138496
author Looney, W. B.
MacLeod, M. S.
Hopkins, H. A.
author_facet Looney, W. B.
MacLeod, M. S.
Hopkins, H. A.
author_sort Looney, W. B.
collection PubMed
description The effects of one large single dose of 5-fluorouracil (FU) have been compared to the same amount given in divided doses daily over a 3- or 5-day period. Comparison of the effects of single vs fractionated dosage was made on 2 types of experimental solid tumour with different growth, cell kinetic, histological and metastasizing properties. The tumour response was essentially the same for both the single and fractionated dose schedules. There were marked increases in animal mortality from drug toxicity following fractionated doses of FU compared to one large single dose. Mortality in animals with Tumour 3924A increased from 10% following one large single dose to 60% for animals given daily fractionated doses for 3 days, and 80% for animals given daily fractionated doses for 5 days. Total marrow reserve was measured by the total DNA content of tibial marrow. The nadir of 6 days for loss of total tibial marrow DNA following one large dose of FU was increased to 9 days for both fractionated schedules of FU. The 3-day delay in recovery of the marrow prevented recovery within the time frame necessary for animal survival. The inference from these experimental cancer-treatment studies is that daily fractions of chemotherapeutic agents such as FU result in increased morbidity and mortality, without benefit in the control of the solid tumour. The results question the advisability of the clinical practice of initially giving small daily “loading doses” of proliferation-dependent agents such as FU. These results emphasize the need for more precise information on the temporal relationship between the response and recovery of the host and the response and recovery of the solid tumour. They also emphasize the need for a better clinical understanding of the time sequence of solid-tumour recovery in relation to the time sequence of marrow recovery.
format Text
id pubmed-2009633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1978
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20096332009-09-10 Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts Looney, W. B. MacLeod, M. S. Hopkins, H. A. Br J Cancer Articles The effects of one large single dose of 5-fluorouracil (FU) have been compared to the same amount given in divided doses daily over a 3- or 5-day period. Comparison of the effects of single vs fractionated dosage was made on 2 types of experimental solid tumour with different growth, cell kinetic, histological and metastasizing properties. The tumour response was essentially the same for both the single and fractionated dose schedules. There were marked increases in animal mortality from drug toxicity following fractionated doses of FU compared to one large single dose. Mortality in animals with Tumour 3924A increased from 10% following one large single dose to 60% for animals given daily fractionated doses for 3 days, and 80% for animals given daily fractionated doses for 5 days. Total marrow reserve was measured by the total DNA content of tibial marrow. The nadir of 6 days for loss of total tibial marrow DNA following one large dose of FU was increased to 9 days for both fractionated schedules of FU. The 3-day delay in recovery of the marrow prevented recovery within the time frame necessary for animal survival. The inference from these experimental cancer-treatment studies is that daily fractions of chemotherapeutic agents such as FU result in increased morbidity and mortality, without benefit in the control of the solid tumour. The results question the advisability of the clinical practice of initially giving small daily “loading doses” of proliferation-dependent agents such as FU. These results emphasize the need for more precise information on the temporal relationship between the response and recovery of the host and the response and recovery of the solid tumour. They also emphasize the need for a better clinical understanding of the time sequence of solid-tumour recovery in relation to the time sequence of marrow recovery. Nature Publishing Group 1978-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2009633/ /pubmed/207298 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Articles
Looney, W. B.
MacLeod, M. S.
Hopkins, H. A.
Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title_full Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title_fullStr Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title_full_unstemmed Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title_short Solid Tumour Models for the Assessment of Different Treatment Modalities: VII: Single vs Fractionated Doses of 5-Fluorouracil on Two Solid Tumours and Their Hosts
title_sort solid tumour models for the assessment of different treatment modalities: vii: single vs fractionated doses of 5-fluorouracil on two solid tumours and their hosts
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/207298
work_keys_str_mv AT looneywb solidtumourmodelsfortheassessmentofdifferenttreatmentmodalitiesviisinglevsfractionateddosesof5fluorouracilontwosolidtumoursandtheirhosts
AT macleodms solidtumourmodelsfortheassessmentofdifferenttreatmentmodalitiesviisinglevsfractionateddosesof5fluorouracilontwosolidtumoursandtheirhosts
AT hopkinsha solidtumourmodelsfortheassessmentofdifferenttreatmentmodalitiesviisinglevsfractionateddosesof5fluorouracilontwosolidtumoursandtheirhosts