Cargando…
A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children
BACKGROUND: This field-based investigation examined the congruence between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance in assessing body composition in children. METHODS: Subjects were 162 female and 160 male children 10–15 years of age. Skinfold measures obtained at the triceps and medial calf and a leg-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC201015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14498990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-2-5 |
_version_ | 1782120946529730560 |
---|---|
author | Goss, Fredric Robertson, Robert Williams, Allison Sward, Kathy Abt, Kristi Ladewig, Melissa Timmer, Jeffrey Dixon, Curt |
author_facet | Goss, Fredric Robertson, Robert Williams, Allison Sward, Kathy Abt, Kristi Ladewig, Melissa Timmer, Jeffrey Dixon, Curt |
author_sort | Goss, Fredric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This field-based investigation examined the congruence between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance in assessing body composition in children. METHODS: Subjects were 162 female and 160 male children 10–15 years of age. Skinfold measures obtained at the triceps and medial calf and a leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance system were used to determine percent fat using child-specific equations. Pearson product moment correlations were performed on the percent fat values obtained using skinfolds and bioelectric impedance for the entire data set. Separate correlations were also conducted on gender and age/gender subsets. Dependent t tests were used to compare the two techniques. RESULTS: Percent fat did not differ between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance for the total subject pool. Bioelectrical impedance overestimated percent fat in girls by 2.6% and underestimated percent fat in boys by 1.7% (p < 0.01). Correlations between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance ranged from r = 0.51 to r = 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance may be a viable alternative field assessment technique that is comparable to skinfolds. The small differences in percent fat between the two techniques may have limited practical significance in school-based health-fitness settings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-201015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-2010152003-09-30 A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children Goss, Fredric Robertson, Robert Williams, Allison Sward, Kathy Abt, Kristi Ladewig, Melissa Timmer, Jeffrey Dixon, Curt Dyn Med Research BACKGROUND: This field-based investigation examined the congruence between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance in assessing body composition in children. METHODS: Subjects were 162 female and 160 male children 10–15 years of age. Skinfold measures obtained at the triceps and medial calf and a leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance system were used to determine percent fat using child-specific equations. Pearson product moment correlations were performed on the percent fat values obtained using skinfolds and bioelectric impedance for the entire data set. Separate correlations were also conducted on gender and age/gender subsets. Dependent t tests were used to compare the two techniques. RESULTS: Percent fat did not differ between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance for the total subject pool. Bioelectrical impedance overestimated percent fat in girls by 2.6% and underestimated percent fat in boys by 1.7% (p < 0.01). Correlations between skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance ranged from r = 0.51 to r = 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance may be a viable alternative field assessment technique that is comparable to skinfolds. The small differences in percent fat between the two techniques may have limited practical significance in school-based health-fitness settings. BioMed Central 2003-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC201015/ /pubmed/14498990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-2-5 Text en Copyright © 2003 Goss et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Goss, Fredric Robertson, Robert Williams, Allison Sward, Kathy Abt, Kristi Ladewig, Melissa Timmer, Jeffrey Dixon, Curt A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title | A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title_full | A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title_fullStr | A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title_short | A comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
title_sort | comparison of skinfolds and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance for the assessment of body composition in children |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC201015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14498990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-2-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gossfredric acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT robertsonrobert acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT williamsallison acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT swardkathy acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT abtkristi acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT ladewigmelissa acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT timmerjeffrey acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT dixoncurt acomparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT gossfredric comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT robertsonrobert comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT williamsallison comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT swardkathy comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT abtkristi comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT ladewigmelissa comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT timmerjeffrey comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren AT dixoncurt comparisonofskinfoldsandlegtolegbioelectricalimpedancefortheassessmentofbodycompositioninchildren |