Cargando…

Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.

Our selection of a potential second-generation platinum compound began with an initial short list of 8 compounds selected on the basis of antitumour and toxicity studies in mice. We now report further, more detailed investigations of the renal toxicity and antitumour activity of one of these compoun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, R., Kusnierczyk, H., Jones, M., Harrap, K. R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1980
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2010534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7193043
_version_ 1782136342318153728
author Shepherd, R.
Kusnierczyk, H.
Jones, M.
Harrap, K. R.
author_facet Shepherd, R.
Kusnierczyk, H.
Jones, M.
Harrap, K. R.
author_sort Shepherd, R.
collection PubMed
description Our selection of a potential second-generation platinum compound began with an initial short list of 8 compounds selected on the basis of antitumour and toxicity studies in mice. We now report further, more detailed investigations of the renal toxicity and antitumour activity of one of these compounds, cis-dichloro trans-dihydroxy bis isopropylamine platinum (IV) (CHIP), in comparison with cis-dichloro diammine platinum (II) (Neoplatin). CHIP was a more effective anti-tumour agent against both alkylating-agent sensitive and resistant strains of the Yoshida sarcoma (YSS and YSR respectively) than was Neoplatin. In addition CHIP produced negligible kidney toxicity as measured by blood urea levels. We have also compared the effects of these two drugs on nuclear-protein phosphorylation, in an attempt to gain insight into their molecular mode of action. Both Neoplatin and CHIP induced increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation in the YSS tumour cells, and loss of condensed chromatin. However, CHIP also induced increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation and loss of condensed chromatin in the YSR tumour cells. These changes correlated well with cell death. In addition Neoplatin, but not CHIP, treatment caused increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation in kidney tissues. This correlated with kidney damage as measured by blood urea levels. These selection criteria suggested that CHIP would be a more selective antitumour agent than Neoplatin, and will provide a basis for its comparison with the other 7 compounds. IMAGES:
format Text
id pubmed-2010534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1980
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20105342009-09-10 Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds. Shepherd, R. Kusnierczyk, H. Jones, M. Harrap, K. R. Br J Cancer Research Article Our selection of a potential second-generation platinum compound began with an initial short list of 8 compounds selected on the basis of antitumour and toxicity studies in mice. We now report further, more detailed investigations of the renal toxicity and antitumour activity of one of these compounds, cis-dichloro trans-dihydroxy bis isopropylamine platinum (IV) (CHIP), in comparison with cis-dichloro diammine platinum (II) (Neoplatin). CHIP was a more effective anti-tumour agent against both alkylating-agent sensitive and resistant strains of the Yoshida sarcoma (YSS and YSR respectively) than was Neoplatin. In addition CHIP produced negligible kidney toxicity as measured by blood urea levels. We have also compared the effects of these two drugs on nuclear-protein phosphorylation, in an attempt to gain insight into their molecular mode of action. Both Neoplatin and CHIP induced increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation in the YSS tumour cells, and loss of condensed chromatin. However, CHIP also induced increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation and loss of condensed chromatin in the YSR tumour cells. These changes correlated well with cell death. In addition Neoplatin, but not CHIP, treatment caused increased nuclear-protein phosphorylation in kidney tissues. This correlated with kidney damage as measured by blood urea levels. These selection criteria suggested that CHIP would be a more selective antitumour agent than Neoplatin, and will provide a basis for its comparison with the other 7 compounds. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1980-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2010534/ /pubmed/7193043 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shepherd, R.
Kusnierczyk, H.
Jones, M.
Harrap, K. R.
Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title_full Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title_fullStr Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title_short Criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
title_sort criteria for the selection of second-generation platinum compounds.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2010534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7193043
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdr criteriafortheselectionofsecondgenerationplatinumcompounds
AT kusnierczykh criteriafortheselectionofsecondgenerationplatinumcompounds
AT jonesm criteriafortheselectionofsecondgenerationplatinumcompounds
AT harrapkr criteriafortheselectionofsecondgenerationplatinumcompounds