Cargando…
Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas.
Two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human cancers in vitro were compared with respect to colony morphology, plating efficiency (PE) and chemosensitivity of human melanomas. In 9 xenografts and 9 patients' biopsy specimens Method A (essentially that of Courtenay & Mills, 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1981
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2010803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7295510 |
_version_ | 1782136398473592832 |
---|---|
author | Tveit, K. M. Endresen, L. Rugstad, H. E. Fodstad, O. Pihl, A. |
author_facet | Tveit, K. M. Endresen, L. Rugstad, H. E. Fodstad, O. Pihl, A. |
author_sort | Tveit, K. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human cancers in vitro were compared with respect to colony morphology, plating efficiency (PE) and chemosensitivity of human melanomas. In 9 xenografts and 9 patients' biopsy specimens Method A (essentially that of Courtenay & Mills, 1978) gave considerably higher PE that Method B (essentially that of Hamburger & Salmon, 1977) and, in contrast to Method B, the number of colonies was proportional to the number of cells plated. Evidence was obtained that the observed differences in PE could be attributed to the low O2 concentration and the presence of rat red blood cells in Method A. Colony morphology was similar in the 2 assays. When cells from 4 xenografted melanomas were treated in vitro with DTIC, CCNU, vinblastine and abrin, and the inhibition of colony formation was assayed concurrently in the 2 soft-agar methods, the tumour cells appeared to be more sensitive to 3 of the drugs in Method B than in A. The results demonstrate that chemosensitivity data obtained with the 2 assays cannot be directly compared. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2010803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1981 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20108032009-09-10 Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. Tveit, K. M. Endresen, L. Rugstad, H. E. Fodstad, O. Pihl, A. Br J Cancer Research Article Two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human cancers in vitro were compared with respect to colony morphology, plating efficiency (PE) and chemosensitivity of human melanomas. In 9 xenografts and 9 patients' biopsy specimens Method A (essentially that of Courtenay & Mills, 1978) gave considerably higher PE that Method B (essentially that of Hamburger & Salmon, 1977) and, in contrast to Method B, the number of colonies was proportional to the number of cells plated. Evidence was obtained that the observed differences in PE could be attributed to the low O2 concentration and the presence of rat red blood cells in Method A. Colony morphology was similar in the 2 assays. When cells from 4 xenografted melanomas were treated in vitro with DTIC, CCNU, vinblastine and abrin, and the inhibition of colony formation was assayed concurrently in the 2 soft-agar methods, the tumour cells appeared to be more sensitive to 3 of the drugs in Method B than in A. The results demonstrate that chemosensitivity data obtained with the 2 assays cannot be directly compared. Nature Publishing Group 1981-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2010803/ /pubmed/7295510 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tveit, K. M. Endresen, L. Rugstad, H. E. Fodstad, O. Pihl, A. Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title | Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title_full | Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title_short | Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
title_sort | comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2010803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7295510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tveitkm comparisonoftwosoftagarmethodsforassayingchemosensitivityofhumantumoursinvitromalignantmelanomas AT endresenl comparisonoftwosoftagarmethodsforassayingchemosensitivityofhumantumoursinvitromalignantmelanomas AT rugstadhe comparisonoftwosoftagarmethodsforassayingchemosensitivityofhumantumoursinvitromalignantmelanomas AT fodstado comparisonoftwosoftagarmethodsforassayingchemosensitivityofhumantumoursinvitromalignantmelanomas AT pihla comparisonoftwosoftagarmethodsforassayingchemosensitivityofhumantumoursinvitromalignantmelanomas |