Cargando…

Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.

One hundred and nineteen patients with breast cancer had 2 or more lesions removed for oestrogen (REc) or progesterone receptor (RPc) assay, either synchronously (on 38 occasions) or after an interval (on 91 occasions). In all but 7 both receptors were assayed for each lesion. The assays did not agr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harland, R. N., Barnes, D. M., Howell, A., Ribeiro, G. G., Taylor, J., Sellwood, R. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1983
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2011332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6682673
_version_ 1782136508304588800
author Harland, R. N.
Barnes, D. M.
Howell, A.
Ribeiro, G. G.
Taylor, J.
Sellwood, R. A.
author_facet Harland, R. N.
Barnes, D. M.
Howell, A.
Ribeiro, G. G.
Taylor, J.
Sellwood, R. A.
author_sort Harland, R. N.
collection PubMed
description One hundred and nineteen patients with breast cancer had 2 or more lesions removed for oestrogen (REc) or progesterone receptor (RPc) assay, either synchronously (on 38 occasions) or after an interval (on 91 occasions). In all but 7 both receptors were assayed for each lesion. The assays did not agree on the presence or absence of REc alone, RPc alone or the combination of both receptors in 11, 13 and 16% respectively of the synchronous samples, compared with 23, 30 and 43% of the asynchronous samples. The differences between the synchronous and asynchronous samples were significant for the combined receptors (P = 0.007) but not for REc (P = 0.176) or RPc alone (P = 0.077). Variation between asynchronous biopsies was greater when the earlier lesion contained RPc (18/37 disagreed) than when it did not (8/50) disagreed, P = 0.0023). This was not true for oestrogen receptor. In those remaining receptor positive there was only a weak correlation between the first and second values (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, rho = 0.39 for REc, P less than 0.02, and 0.45 for RPc, 0.05 less than P less than 0.1). Receptor levels and receptor status may change with time. Biopsy is most appropriate at the time when systemic treatment is proposed.
format Text
id pubmed-2011332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1983
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20113322009-09-10 Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast. Harland, R. N. Barnes, D. M. Howell, A. Ribeiro, G. G. Taylor, J. Sellwood, R. A. Br J Cancer Research Article One hundred and nineteen patients with breast cancer had 2 or more lesions removed for oestrogen (REc) or progesterone receptor (RPc) assay, either synchronously (on 38 occasions) or after an interval (on 91 occasions). In all but 7 both receptors were assayed for each lesion. The assays did not agree on the presence or absence of REc alone, RPc alone or the combination of both receptors in 11, 13 and 16% respectively of the synchronous samples, compared with 23, 30 and 43% of the asynchronous samples. The differences between the synchronous and asynchronous samples were significant for the combined receptors (P = 0.007) but not for REc (P = 0.176) or RPc alone (P = 0.077). Variation between asynchronous biopsies was greater when the earlier lesion contained RPc (18/37 disagreed) than when it did not (8/50) disagreed, P = 0.0023). This was not true for oestrogen receptor. In those remaining receptor positive there was only a weak correlation between the first and second values (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, rho = 0.39 for REc, P less than 0.02, and 0.45 for RPc, 0.05 less than P less than 0.1). Receptor levels and receptor status may change with time. Biopsy is most appropriate at the time when systemic treatment is proposed. Nature Publishing Group 1983-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2011332/ /pubmed/6682673 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harland, R. N.
Barnes, D. M.
Howell, A.
Ribeiro, G. G.
Taylor, J.
Sellwood, R. A.
Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title_full Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title_fullStr Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title_full_unstemmed Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title_short Variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
title_sort variation of receptor status in cancer of the breast.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2011332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6682673
work_keys_str_mv AT harlandrn variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast
AT barnesdm variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast
AT howella variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast
AT ribeirogg variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast
AT taylorj variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast
AT sellwoodra variationofreceptorstatusincancerofthebreast