Cargando…

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Elm, Erik, Altman, Douglas G, Egger, Matthias, Pocock, Stuart J, Gøtzsche, Peter C, Vandenbroucke, Jan P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
_version_ 1782136607310086144
author von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Egger, Matthias
Pocock, Stuart J
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Vandenbroucke, Jan P
author_facet von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Egger, Matthias
Pocock, Stuart J
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Vandenbroucke, Jan P
author_sort von Elm, Erik
collection PubMed
description Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2020495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20204952007-10-27 The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Egger, Matthias Pocock, Stuart J Gøtzsche, Peter C Vandenbroucke, Jan P PLoS Med Research Article Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. Public Library of Science 2007-10 2007-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2020495/ /pubmed/17941714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 Text en © 2007 von Elm et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Egger, Matthias
Pocock, Stuart J
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Vandenbroucke, Jan P
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title_full The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title_fullStr The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title_short The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
title_sort strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
work_keys_str_mv AT vonelmerik thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT altmandouglasg thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT eggermatthias thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT pocockstuartj thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT gøtzschepeterc thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT vandenbrouckejanp thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT thestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT vonelmerik strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT altmandouglasg strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT eggermatthias strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT pocockstuartj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT gøtzschepeterc strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT vandenbrouckejanp strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies
AT strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatementguidelinesforreportingobservationalstudies