Cargando…

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vandenbroucke, Jan P, von Elm, Erik, Altman, Douglas G, Gøtzsche, Peter C, Mulrow, Cynthia D, Pocock, Stuart J, Poole, Charles, Schlesselman, James J, Egger, Matthias
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
_version_ 1782136607530287104
author Vandenbroucke, Jan P
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Mulrow, Cynthia D
Pocock, Stuart J
Poole, Charles
Schlesselman, James J
Egger, Matthias
author_facet Vandenbroucke, Jan P
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Mulrow, Cynthia D
Pocock, Stuart J
Poole, Charles
Schlesselman, James J
Egger, Matthias
author_sort Vandenbroucke, Jan P
collection PubMed
description Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
format Text
id pubmed-2020496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20204962007-10-27 Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration Vandenbroucke, Jan P von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Gøtzsche, Peter C Mulrow, Cynthia D Pocock, Stuart J Poole, Charles Schlesselman, James J Egger, Matthias PLoS Med Research Article Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. Public Library of Science 2007-10 2007-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2020496/ /pubmed/17941715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 Text en © 2007 Vandenbroucke et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vandenbroucke, Jan P
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Mulrow, Cynthia D
Pocock, Stuart J
Poole, Charles
Schlesselman, James J
Egger, Matthias
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title_full Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title_fullStr Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title_short Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
title_sort strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe): explanation and elaboration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbrouckejanp strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT vonelmerik strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT altmandouglasg strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT gøtzschepeterc strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT mulrowcynthiad strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT pocockstuartj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT poolecharles strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT schlesselmanjamesj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT eggermatthias strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration
AT strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration