Cargando…
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 |
_version_ | 1782136607530287104 |
---|---|
author | Vandenbroucke, Jan P von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Gøtzsche, Peter C Mulrow, Cynthia D Pocock, Stuart J Poole, Charles Schlesselman, James J Egger, Matthias |
author_facet | Vandenbroucke, Jan P von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Gøtzsche, Peter C Mulrow, Cynthia D Pocock, Stuart J Poole, Charles Schlesselman, James J Egger, Matthias |
author_sort | Vandenbroucke, Jan P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2020496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20204962007-10-27 Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration Vandenbroucke, Jan P von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Gøtzsche, Peter C Mulrow, Cynthia D Pocock, Stuart J Poole, Charles Schlesselman, James J Egger, Matthias PLoS Med Research Article Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. Public Library of Science 2007-10 2007-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2020496/ /pubmed/17941715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 Text en © 2007 Vandenbroucke et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vandenbroucke, Jan P von Elm, Erik Altman, Douglas G Gøtzsche, Peter C Mulrow, Cynthia D Pocock, Stuart J Poole, Charles Schlesselman, James J Egger, Matthias Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title_full | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title_fullStr | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title_short | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration |
title_sort | strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe): explanation and elaboration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2020496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbrouckejanp strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT vonelmerik strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT altmandouglasg strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT gøtzschepeterc strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT mulrowcynthiad strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT pocockstuartj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT poolecharles strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT schlesselmanjamesj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT eggermatthias strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration AT strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobeexplanationandelaboration |