Cargando…
Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins.
It has been reported that lymphocytes from cancer patients give positive responses to PPD, myelin basic protein, tumour basic protein, and certain histone fractions in the MEM test. The underlying mechanisms of the MEM test are poorly understood, but it is widely assumed that it detects immunologica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1976
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2025127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/60119 |
_version_ | 1782136702043684864 |
---|---|
author | Shaw, A. Ettin, G. McPherson, T. A. |
author_facet | Shaw, A. Ettin, G. McPherson, T. A. |
author_sort | Shaw, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been reported that lymphocytes from cancer patients give positive responses to PPD, myelin basic protein, tumour basic protein, and certain histone fractions in the MEM test. The underlying mechanisms of the MEM test are poorly understood, but it is widely assumed that it detects immunological sensitization to specific antigenic determinants. The cross-reactivity experienced is interpreted as indicating shared antigenicity. Since all the stimulatory proteins are strongly basic we investigated an alternative explanation that responsiveness is a function of electrical charge by comparing the known stimulatory proteins in the MEM test with two others of similar basicity: lysozyme and cytochrome-C. We obtained highly significant stimulation with PPD, tryptophane peptide of myelin, and tumour basic protein using Mantoux + cancer patients, but found no response to other basic proteins. We failed to confirm the reported activity of histone F2a. Our results indicate that basicity alone is insufficient to elicit response, and strengthens the concept that the MEM test is measuring sensitization to the determinants shared by myelin and tumour basic protein. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2025127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1976 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20251272009-09-10 Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. Shaw, A. Ettin, G. McPherson, T. A. Br J Cancer Research Article It has been reported that lymphocytes from cancer patients give positive responses to PPD, myelin basic protein, tumour basic protein, and certain histone fractions in the MEM test. The underlying mechanisms of the MEM test are poorly understood, but it is widely assumed that it detects immunological sensitization to specific antigenic determinants. The cross-reactivity experienced is interpreted as indicating shared antigenicity. Since all the stimulatory proteins are strongly basic we investigated an alternative explanation that responsiveness is a function of electrical charge by comparing the known stimulatory proteins in the MEM test with two others of similar basicity: lysozyme and cytochrome-C. We obtained highly significant stimulation with PPD, tryptophane peptide of myelin, and tumour basic protein using Mantoux + cancer patients, but found no response to other basic proteins. We failed to confirm the reported activity of histone F2a. Our results indicate that basicity alone is insufficient to elicit response, and strengthens the concept that the MEM test is measuring sensitization to the determinants shared by myelin and tumour basic protein. Nature Publishing Group 1976-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2025127/ /pubmed/60119 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shaw, A. Ettin, G. McPherson, T. A. Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title | Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title_full | Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title_fullStr | Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title_full_unstemmed | Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title_short | Responses of cancer patients in the MEM test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
title_sort | responses of cancer patients in the mem test: not just a function of charge on basic proteins. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2025127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/60119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shawa responsesofcancerpatientsinthememtestnotjustafunctionofchargeonbasicproteins AT etting responsesofcancerpatientsinthememtestnotjustafunctionofchargeonbasicproteins AT mcphersonta responsesofcancerpatientsinthememtestnotjustafunctionofchargeonbasicproteins |