Cargando…

Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum

BACKGROUND: A reliable quenching and metabolite extraction method has been developed for Lactobacillus plantarum. The energy charge value was used as a critical indicator for fixation of metabolism. RESULTS: Four different aqueous quenching solutions, all containing 60% of methanol, were compared fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faijes, Magda, Mars, Astrid E, Smid, Eddy J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2031893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17708760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-6-27
_version_ 1782136802533965824
author Faijes, Magda
Mars, Astrid E
Smid, Eddy J
author_facet Faijes, Magda
Mars, Astrid E
Smid, Eddy J
author_sort Faijes, Magda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A reliable quenching and metabolite extraction method has been developed for Lactobacillus plantarum. The energy charge value was used as a critical indicator for fixation of metabolism. RESULTS: Four different aqueous quenching solutions, all containing 60% of methanol, were compared for their efficiency. Only the solutions containing either 70 mM HEPES or 0.85% (w/v) ammonium carbonate (pH 5.5) caused less than 10% cell leakage and the energy charge of the quenched cells was high, indicating rapid inactivation of the metabolism. The efficiency of extraction of intracellular metabolites from cell cultures depends on the extraction methods, and is expected to vary between micro-organisms. For L. plantarum, we have compared five different extraction methodologies based on (i) cold methanol, (ii) perchloric acid, (iii) boiling ethanol, (iv) chloroform/methanol (1:1) and (v) chloroform/water (1:1). Quantification of representative intracellular metabolites showed that the best extraction efficiencies were achieved with cold methanol, boiling ethanol and perchloric acid. CONCLUSION: The ammonium carbonate solution was selected as the most suitable quenching buffer for metabolomics studies in L. plantarum because (i) leakage is minimal, (ii) the energy charge indicates good fixation of metabolism, and (iii) all components are easily removed during freeze-drying. A modified procedure based on cold methanol extraction combined good extractability with mild extraction conditions and high enzymatic inactivation. These features make the combination of these quenching and extraction protocols very suitable for metabolomics studies with L. plantarum.
format Text
id pubmed-2031893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20318932007-10-17 Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum Faijes, Magda Mars, Astrid E Smid, Eddy J Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: A reliable quenching and metabolite extraction method has been developed for Lactobacillus plantarum. The energy charge value was used as a critical indicator for fixation of metabolism. RESULTS: Four different aqueous quenching solutions, all containing 60% of methanol, were compared for their efficiency. Only the solutions containing either 70 mM HEPES or 0.85% (w/v) ammonium carbonate (pH 5.5) caused less than 10% cell leakage and the energy charge of the quenched cells was high, indicating rapid inactivation of the metabolism. The efficiency of extraction of intracellular metabolites from cell cultures depends on the extraction methods, and is expected to vary between micro-organisms. For L. plantarum, we have compared five different extraction methodologies based on (i) cold methanol, (ii) perchloric acid, (iii) boiling ethanol, (iv) chloroform/methanol (1:1) and (v) chloroform/water (1:1). Quantification of representative intracellular metabolites showed that the best extraction efficiencies were achieved with cold methanol, boiling ethanol and perchloric acid. CONCLUSION: The ammonium carbonate solution was selected as the most suitable quenching buffer for metabolomics studies in L. plantarum because (i) leakage is minimal, (ii) the energy charge indicates good fixation of metabolism, and (iii) all components are easily removed during freeze-drying. A modified procedure based on cold methanol extraction combined good extractability with mild extraction conditions and high enzymatic inactivation. These features make the combination of these quenching and extraction protocols very suitable for metabolomics studies with L. plantarum. BioMed Central 2007-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2031893/ /pubmed/17708760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-6-27 Text en Copyright © 2007 Faijes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Faijes, Magda
Mars, Astrid E
Smid, Eddy J
Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title_full Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title_fullStr Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title_short Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum
title_sort comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of lactobacillus plantarum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2031893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17708760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-6-27
work_keys_str_mv AT faijesmagda comparisonofquenchingandextractionmethodologiesformetabolomeanalysisoflactobacillusplantarum
AT marsastride comparisonofquenchingandextractionmethodologiesformetabolomeanalysisoflactobacillusplantarum
AT smideddyj comparisonofquenchingandextractionmethodologiesformetabolomeanalysisoflactobacillusplantarum