Cargando…

Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes

BACKGROUND: In comparative analyses of bacterial pathogens, it has been common practice to discriminate between two types of genes: (i) those shared by pathogens and their non-pathogenic relatives (core genes), and (ii) those found exclusively in pathogens (pathogen-specific accessory genes). Rather...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anisimova, Maria, Bielawski, Joseph, Dunn, Katherine, Yang, Ziheng
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2031904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17760998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-154
_version_ 1782136805160648704
author Anisimova, Maria
Bielawski, Joseph
Dunn, Katherine
Yang, Ziheng
author_facet Anisimova, Maria
Bielawski, Joseph
Dunn, Katherine
Yang, Ziheng
author_sort Anisimova, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In comparative analyses of bacterial pathogens, it has been common practice to discriminate between two types of genes: (i) those shared by pathogens and their non-pathogenic relatives (core genes), and (ii) those found exclusively in pathogens (pathogen-specific accessory genes). Rather than attempting to a priori delineate genes into sets more or less relevant to pathogenicity, we took a broad approach to the analysis of Streptococcus species by investigating the strength of natural selection in all clusters of homologous genes. The genus Streptococcus is comprised of a wide variety of both pathogenic and commensal lineages, and we relate our findings to the pre-existing knowledge of Streptococcus virulence factors. RESULTS: Our analysis of 1730 gene clusters revealed 136 cases of positive Darwinian selection, which we suggest is most likely to result from an antagonistic interaction between the host and pathogen at the molecular level. A two-step validation procedure suggests that positive selection was robustly identified in our genomic survey. We found no evidence to support the notion that pathogen specific accessory genes are more likely to be subject to positive selection than core genes. Indeed, we even uncovered a few cases of essential gene evolution by positive selection. Among the gene clusters subject to positive selection, a large fraction (29%) can be connected to virulence. The most striking finding was that a considerable fraction of the positively selected genes are also known to have tissue specific patterns of expression during invasive disease. As current expression data is far from comprehensive, we suggest that this fraction was underestimated. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pathogen specific genes, although a popular focus of research, do not provide a complete picture of the evolutionary dynamics of virulence. The results of this study, and others, support the notion that the products of both core and accessory genes participate in complex networks that comprise the molecular basis of virulence. Future work should seek to understand the evolutionary dynamics of both core and accessory genes as a function of the networks in which they participate.
format Text
id pubmed-2031904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20319042007-10-17 Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes Anisimova, Maria Bielawski, Joseph Dunn, Katherine Yang, Ziheng BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: In comparative analyses of bacterial pathogens, it has been common practice to discriminate between two types of genes: (i) those shared by pathogens and their non-pathogenic relatives (core genes), and (ii) those found exclusively in pathogens (pathogen-specific accessory genes). Rather than attempting to a priori delineate genes into sets more or less relevant to pathogenicity, we took a broad approach to the analysis of Streptococcus species by investigating the strength of natural selection in all clusters of homologous genes. The genus Streptococcus is comprised of a wide variety of both pathogenic and commensal lineages, and we relate our findings to the pre-existing knowledge of Streptococcus virulence factors. RESULTS: Our analysis of 1730 gene clusters revealed 136 cases of positive Darwinian selection, which we suggest is most likely to result from an antagonistic interaction between the host and pathogen at the molecular level. A two-step validation procedure suggests that positive selection was robustly identified in our genomic survey. We found no evidence to support the notion that pathogen specific accessory genes are more likely to be subject to positive selection than core genes. Indeed, we even uncovered a few cases of essential gene evolution by positive selection. Among the gene clusters subject to positive selection, a large fraction (29%) can be connected to virulence. The most striking finding was that a considerable fraction of the positively selected genes are also known to have tissue specific patterns of expression during invasive disease. As current expression data is far from comprehensive, we suggest that this fraction was underestimated. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pathogen specific genes, although a popular focus of research, do not provide a complete picture of the evolutionary dynamics of virulence. The results of this study, and others, support the notion that the products of both core and accessory genes participate in complex networks that comprise the molecular basis of virulence. Future work should seek to understand the evolutionary dynamics of both core and accessory genes as a function of the networks in which they participate. BioMed Central 2007-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2031904/ /pubmed/17760998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-154 Text en Copyright © 2007 Anisimova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anisimova, Maria
Bielawski, Joseph
Dunn, Katherine
Yang, Ziheng
Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title_full Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title_fullStr Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title_short Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes
title_sort phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in streptococcus genomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2031904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17760998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-154
work_keys_str_mv AT anisimovamaria phylogenomicanalysisofnaturalselectionpressureinstreptococcusgenomes
AT bielawskijoseph phylogenomicanalysisofnaturalselectionpressureinstreptococcusgenomes
AT dunnkatherine phylogenomicanalysisofnaturalselectionpressureinstreptococcusgenomes
AT yangziheng phylogenomicanalysisofnaturalselectionpressureinstreptococcusgenomes