Cargando…

How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?

In order to assess the accuracy of Scottish cancer registration data, a random sample of 2,200 registrations, attributed to the year 1990, was generated. Relevant medical records were available for review in 2,021 (92%) cases. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brewster, D., Crichton, J., Muir, C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7947104
_version_ 1782136861261561856
author Brewster, D.
Crichton, J.
Muir, C.
author_facet Brewster, D.
Crichton, J.
Muir, C.
author_sort Brewster, D.
collection PubMed
description In order to assess the accuracy of Scottish cancer registration data, a random sample of 2,200 registrations, attributed to the year 1990, was generated. Relevant medical records were available for review in 2,021 (92%) cases. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were found in 3.5% of cases. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 7.1% in post code of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 11.0% in anniversary date (excluding differences of 6 weeks or less), 7.7% in histological verification status, 5.4% in ICD-9 site codes (the first three digits) and 14.5% in ICD-O morphology codes (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Overall, serious discrepancies were judged to have occurred in 2.8% of cases. In many respects, therefore, Scottish cancer registration data show a high level of accuracy that compares favourably to the reported accuracy of the few other cancer registries undertaking such analyses.
format Text
id pubmed-2033548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20335482009-09-10 How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data? Brewster, D. Crichton, J. Muir, C. Br J Cancer Research Article In order to assess the accuracy of Scottish cancer registration data, a random sample of 2,200 registrations, attributed to the year 1990, was generated. Relevant medical records were available for review in 2,021 (92%) cases. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were found in 3.5% of cases. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 7.1% in post code of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 11.0% in anniversary date (excluding differences of 6 weeks or less), 7.7% in histological verification status, 5.4% in ICD-9 site codes (the first three digits) and 14.5% in ICD-O morphology codes (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Overall, serious discrepancies were judged to have occurred in 2.8% of cases. In many respects, therefore, Scottish cancer registration data show a high level of accuracy that compares favourably to the reported accuracy of the few other cancer registries undertaking such analyses. Nature Publishing Group 1994-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2033548/ /pubmed/7947104 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brewster, D.
Crichton, J.
Muir, C.
How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title_full How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title_fullStr How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title_full_unstemmed How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title_short How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?
title_sort how accurate are scottish cancer registration data?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7947104
work_keys_str_mv AT brewsterd howaccuratearescottishcancerregistrationdata
AT crichtonj howaccuratearescottishcancerregistrationdata
AT muirc howaccuratearescottishcancerregistrationdata