Cargando…

Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?

Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy ov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estève, J., Parker, L., Roy, P., Herrmann, F., Duffy, S., Frappaz, D., Lasset, C., Hill, C., Sancho-Garnier, H., Michaelis, J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7779698
_version_ 1782136924914319360
author Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
author_facet Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
author_sort Estève, J.
collection PubMed
description Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity.
format Text
id pubmed-2033839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20338392009-09-10 Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. Br J Cancer Research Article Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity. Nature Publishing Group 1995-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2033839/ /pubmed/7779698 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_full Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_fullStr Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_full_unstemmed Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_short Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_sort is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7779698
work_keys_str_mv AT estevej isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT parkerl isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT royp isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT herrmannf isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT duffys isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT frappazd isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT lassetc isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT hillc isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT sanchogarnierh isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible
AT michaelisj isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible