Cargando…
Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy ov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7779698 |
_version_ | 1782136924914319360 |
---|---|
author | Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. |
author_facet | Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. |
author_sort | Estève, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2033839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20338392009-09-10 Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. Br J Cancer Research Article Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity. Nature Publishing Group 1995-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2033839/ /pubmed/7779698 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title | Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title_full | Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title_fullStr | Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title_short | Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
title_sort | is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7779698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estevej isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT parkerl isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT royp isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT herrmannf isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT duffys isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT frappazd isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT lassetc isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT hillc isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT sanchogarnierh isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible AT michaelisj isneuroblastomascreeningevaluationneededandfeasible |