Cargando…
Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study.
Twenty-three patients with pleural mesothelioma stage I-IIA were entered in a study of continuous daily intrapleural infusion of interleukin 2 (IL-2) for 14 days, repeated every 4 weeks. IL-2 was administered according to a groupwise dose escalation schedule (group A, 3 x 10(4); group B, 3 x 10(5);...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7577483 |
_version_ | 1782136942275592192 |
---|---|
author | Goey, S. H. Eggermont, A. M. Punt, C. J. Slingerland, R. Gratama, J. W. Oosterom, R. Oskam, R. Bolhuis, R. L. Stoter, G. |
author_facet | Goey, S. H. Eggermont, A. M. Punt, C. J. Slingerland, R. Gratama, J. W. Oosterom, R. Oskam, R. Bolhuis, R. L. Stoter, G. |
author_sort | Goey, S. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Twenty-three patients with pleural mesothelioma stage I-IIA were entered in a study of continuous daily intrapleural infusion of interleukin 2 (IL-2) for 14 days, repeated every 4 weeks. IL-2 was administered according to a groupwise dose escalation schedule (group A, 3 x 10(4); group B, 3 x 10(5); group C, 3 x 10(6); group D, 6 x 10(6); group E, 18 x 10(6); and group F, 36 x 10(6) IU day-1). Each group consisted of at least three patients. Intrapleural administration of IL-2 was associated with acceptable toxicity. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis except for the patients at dose levels E and F. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at level F, 36 x 10(6) IU daily, and consisted of catheter infection, fever and flu-like symptoms. Intrapleural IL-2 levels were high (> 20,000 IU ml-1) at levels E and F, while serum levels in most patients were not or barely detectable (< 3-30 IU ml-1). Intrapleural IL-2 levels were up to 6000-fold higher than systemic levels. Intrapleural tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels varied greatly and did not correlate with IL-2 dosage. Intrapleural mononuclear cells (MNCs) displayed IL-2-induced lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) activity in all patients. Two patients were not evaluable for response owing to catheter-related problems which precluded the delivery of IL-2. Partial response (PR) occurred in 4 of 21 evaluable patients (19%; 95% confidence interval 5-42%) with a median time to progression of 12 months (range 5-37). Stable disease (SD) occurred in seven patients with a median time to progression of 5 months (range 2-7). There were no complete responses (CRs). The median overall survival was 15.6 months (range 3.0-43). No relationship between the dose of IL-2 and response rate was observed. We conclude that IL-2 given intrapleurally is accompanied with acceptable toxicity and has anti-tumour activity against mesothelioma. In view of the refractory nature of the disease IL-2 may be a treatment option for mesothelioma. A formal phase II study is warranted. Based on the observed toxicity, the lack of dose-response relationship and the immunomodulatory effects seen at relatively low-dose IL-2, the recommended dose for a phase II study is 3 x 10(6) IU day-1 using the present treatment schedule. IMAGES: |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2033917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20339172009-09-10 Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. Goey, S. H. Eggermont, A. M. Punt, C. J. Slingerland, R. Gratama, J. W. Oosterom, R. Oskam, R. Bolhuis, R. L. Stoter, G. Br J Cancer Research Article Twenty-three patients with pleural mesothelioma stage I-IIA were entered in a study of continuous daily intrapleural infusion of interleukin 2 (IL-2) for 14 days, repeated every 4 weeks. IL-2 was administered according to a groupwise dose escalation schedule (group A, 3 x 10(4); group B, 3 x 10(5); group C, 3 x 10(6); group D, 6 x 10(6); group E, 18 x 10(6); and group F, 36 x 10(6) IU day-1). Each group consisted of at least three patients. Intrapleural administration of IL-2 was associated with acceptable toxicity. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis except for the patients at dose levels E and F. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at level F, 36 x 10(6) IU daily, and consisted of catheter infection, fever and flu-like symptoms. Intrapleural IL-2 levels were high (> 20,000 IU ml-1) at levels E and F, while serum levels in most patients were not or barely detectable (< 3-30 IU ml-1). Intrapleural IL-2 levels were up to 6000-fold higher than systemic levels. Intrapleural tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels varied greatly and did not correlate with IL-2 dosage. Intrapleural mononuclear cells (MNCs) displayed IL-2-induced lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) activity in all patients. Two patients were not evaluable for response owing to catheter-related problems which precluded the delivery of IL-2. Partial response (PR) occurred in 4 of 21 evaluable patients (19%; 95% confidence interval 5-42%) with a median time to progression of 12 months (range 5-37). Stable disease (SD) occurred in seven patients with a median time to progression of 5 months (range 2-7). There were no complete responses (CRs). The median overall survival was 15.6 months (range 3.0-43). No relationship between the dose of IL-2 and response rate was observed. We conclude that IL-2 given intrapleurally is accompanied with acceptable toxicity and has anti-tumour activity against mesothelioma. In view of the refractory nature of the disease IL-2 may be a treatment option for mesothelioma. A formal phase II study is warranted. Based on the observed toxicity, the lack of dose-response relationship and the immunomodulatory effects seen at relatively low-dose IL-2, the recommended dose for a phase II study is 3 x 10(6) IU day-1 using the present treatment schedule. IMAGES: Nature Publishing Group 1995-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2033917/ /pubmed/7577483 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goey, S. H. Eggermont, A. M. Punt, C. J. Slingerland, R. Gratama, J. W. Oosterom, R. Oskam, R. Bolhuis, R. L. Stoter, G. Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title | Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title_full | Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title_fullStr | Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title_short | Intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II study. |
title_sort | intrapleural administration of interleukin 2 in pleural mesothelioma: a phase i-ii study. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7577483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goeysh intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT eggermontam intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT puntcj intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT slingerlandr intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT gratamajw intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT oosteromr intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT oskamr intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT bolhuisrl intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy AT stoterg intrapleuraladministrationofinterleukin2inpleuralmesotheliomaaphaseiiistudy |