Cargando…

Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland

BACKGROUND: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th )March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petticrew, Mark, Semple, Sean, Hilton, Shona, Creely, Kaen S, Eadie, Douglas, Ritchie, Deborah, Ferrell, Catherine, Christopher, Yvette, Hurley, Fintan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17692118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-204
_version_ 1782137020581150720
author Petticrew, Mark
Semple, Sean
Hilton, Shona
Creely, Kaen S
Eadie, Douglas
Ritchie, Deborah
Ferrell, Catherine
Christopher, Yvette
Hurley, Fintan
author_facet Petticrew, Mark
Semple, Sean
Hilton, Shona
Creely, Kaen S
Eadie, Douglas
Ritchie, Deborah
Ferrell, Catherine
Christopher, Yvette
Hurley, Fintan
author_sort Petticrew, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th )March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation. METHODS: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions. RESULTS: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; (iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed. CONCLUSION: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2034551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20345512007-10-19 Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland Petticrew, Mark Semple, Sean Hilton, Shona Creely, Kaen S Eadie, Douglas Ritchie, Deborah Ferrell, Catherine Christopher, Yvette Hurley, Fintan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th )March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation. METHODS: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions. RESULTS: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; (iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed. CONCLUSION: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies. BioMed Central 2007-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2034551/ /pubmed/17692118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-204 Text en Copyright © 2007 Petticrew et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petticrew, Mark
Semple, Sean
Hilton, Shona
Creely, Kaen S
Eadie, Douglas
Ritchie, Deborah
Ferrell, Catherine
Christopher, Yvette
Hurley, Fintan
Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title_full Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title_fullStr Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title_short Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland
title_sort covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in scotland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17692118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-204
work_keys_str_mv AT petticrewmark covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT semplesean covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT hiltonshona covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT creelykaens covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT eadiedouglas covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT ritchiedeborah covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT ferrellcatherine covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT christopheryvette covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland
AT hurleyfintan covertobservationinpracticelessonsfromtheevaluationoftheprohibitionofsmokinginpublicplacesinscotland