Cargando…

Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?

BACKGROUND: Zambia experienced declining aggregate fertility and increasing aggregate contraceptive use from 1990 to 2000. Yet, in rural Zambia, progress in family planning has lagged far behind the advances made in Zambia's urban areas. The contraceptive prevalence rate in Lusaka and other urb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Justin S, Speizer, Ilene S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17803805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-143
_version_ 1782137021568909312
author White, Justin S
Speizer, Ilene S
author_facet White, Justin S
Speizer, Ilene S
author_sort White, Justin S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Zambia experienced declining aggregate fertility and increasing aggregate contraceptive use from 1990 to 2000. Yet, in rural Zambia, progress in family planning has lagged far behind the advances made in Zambia's urban areas. The contraceptive prevalence rate in Lusaka and other urban areas outstripped the rate in rural Zambia by nearly 25 percentage points (41.2 percent versus 16.6 percent) in 2001. The total fertility rate varied between urban and rural areas by 2.5 children (4.3 versus 6.9 children). This paper considers the urban-rural differentials in Zambia and assesses family planning outreach as a tool to narrow this divide. METHODS: This study uses the Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, collected between 2001 and 2002. Logistic regression techniques were employed to examine factors associated with contraceptive use. The first analysis tested modern contraceptive use versus traditional method use and no use. In addition, separate models were run for samples stratified by type of residence (rural or urban) to determine if different factors were associated with use by residence. A simulation determined the effect of all women receiving at least one household visit from a health worker if all other variables were held constant. RESULTS: Differences in modern contraceptive use between urban and rural areas persist (OR: 1.56, 95 percent CI: 1.24–1.96) even after adjusting for a number of demographic, socioeconomic, cognitive, and attitudinal factors. Household visits by a community health worker significantly increased the likelihood of modern contraceptive use among rural women (OR: 1.83; 95 percent CI: 1.29–2.58). If all rural women received at least one outreach visit per year, the prevalence rate for modern contraceptive methods would be expected to increase for this group by 5.9 percentage points, a marked increase but less than one-quarter of the total urban-rural differential. CONCLUSION: Outreach in the form of health worker visits can improve access to family planning services, but it does not eliminate barriers to access or address continued high-fertility desires in Zambia. Until policymakers consider strategies that address both family planning demand creation and supply of services, progress in Zambia and the rest of sub-Saharan Africa will continue to lag behind the rest of the world.
format Text
id pubmed-2034555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20345552007-10-19 Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia? White, Justin S Speizer, Ilene S BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Zambia experienced declining aggregate fertility and increasing aggregate contraceptive use from 1990 to 2000. Yet, in rural Zambia, progress in family planning has lagged far behind the advances made in Zambia's urban areas. The contraceptive prevalence rate in Lusaka and other urban areas outstripped the rate in rural Zambia by nearly 25 percentage points (41.2 percent versus 16.6 percent) in 2001. The total fertility rate varied between urban and rural areas by 2.5 children (4.3 versus 6.9 children). This paper considers the urban-rural differentials in Zambia and assesses family planning outreach as a tool to narrow this divide. METHODS: This study uses the Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, collected between 2001 and 2002. Logistic regression techniques were employed to examine factors associated with contraceptive use. The first analysis tested modern contraceptive use versus traditional method use and no use. In addition, separate models were run for samples stratified by type of residence (rural or urban) to determine if different factors were associated with use by residence. A simulation determined the effect of all women receiving at least one household visit from a health worker if all other variables were held constant. RESULTS: Differences in modern contraceptive use between urban and rural areas persist (OR: 1.56, 95 percent CI: 1.24–1.96) even after adjusting for a number of demographic, socioeconomic, cognitive, and attitudinal factors. Household visits by a community health worker significantly increased the likelihood of modern contraceptive use among rural women (OR: 1.83; 95 percent CI: 1.29–2.58). If all rural women received at least one outreach visit per year, the prevalence rate for modern contraceptive methods would be expected to increase for this group by 5.9 percentage points, a marked increase but less than one-quarter of the total urban-rural differential. CONCLUSION: Outreach in the form of health worker visits can improve access to family planning services, but it does not eliminate barriers to access or address continued high-fertility desires in Zambia. Until policymakers consider strategies that address both family planning demand creation and supply of services, progress in Zambia and the rest of sub-Saharan Africa will continue to lag behind the rest of the world. BioMed Central 2007-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2034555/ /pubmed/17803805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-143 Text en Copyright © 2007 White and Speizer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
White, Justin S
Speizer, Ilene S
Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title_full Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title_fullStr Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title_full_unstemmed Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title_short Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?
title_sort can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in zambia?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17803805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-143
work_keys_str_mv AT whitejustins canfamilyplanningoutreachbridgetheurbanruraldivideinzambia
AT speizerilenes canfamilyplanningoutreachbridgetheurbanruraldivideinzambia