Cargando…
Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became av...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17868475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54 |
_version_ | 1782137023699615744 |
---|---|
author | Rietveld, Remco P ter Riet, Gerben Bindels, Patrick JE Schellevis, François G van Weert, Henk CPM |
author_facet | Rietveld, Remco P ter Riet, Gerben Bindels, Patrick JE Schellevis, François G van Weert, Henk CPM |
author_sort | Rietveld, Remco P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became available from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. We measured the age-specific incidence of infectious conjunctivitis, described its management by Dutch general practitioners, and then compared these findings with the recommendations made in the guideline. METHODS: In 2001, over a 12-month period, data from all patient contacts with 195 general practitioners were taken from electronic medical records. Registration was episode-oriented; all consultations dealing with the same health problem were grouped into disease episodes. Data concerning all episodes of infectious conjunctivitis (ICPC-code F70 and sub codes) were analysed. RESULTS: Over one year, 5,213 new and recurrent episodes of infectious conjunctivitis were presented to general practitioners from a population of N = 375,899, resulting in an overall incidence rate of 13.9 per 1000 person-years, varying from more than 80/1000 py in children up to one-year old, to less than 12/1000 py in children over the age of 4. Topical ophthalmic ointments were prescribed in 87% of the episodes, of which 80% was antibiotic treatment. Fusidic acid gel was most frequently prescribed (69%). In most episodes general practitioners did not adhere to the guideline. CONCLUSION: In 2001, the management of infectious conjunctivitis by Dutch general practitioners was not in accordance with the recommendations of the consensus-based guideline published five years previously, despite its wide distribution. In 2006 this guideline was revised. Its successful implementation requires more than distribution alone. Probably the most effective way to achieve this is by following a model for systemic implementation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2034564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20345642007-10-19 Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice Rietveld, Remco P ter Riet, Gerben Bindels, Patrick JE Schellevis, François G van Weert, Henk CPM BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became available from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. We measured the age-specific incidence of infectious conjunctivitis, described its management by Dutch general practitioners, and then compared these findings with the recommendations made in the guideline. METHODS: In 2001, over a 12-month period, data from all patient contacts with 195 general practitioners were taken from electronic medical records. Registration was episode-oriented; all consultations dealing with the same health problem were grouped into disease episodes. Data concerning all episodes of infectious conjunctivitis (ICPC-code F70 and sub codes) were analysed. RESULTS: Over one year, 5,213 new and recurrent episodes of infectious conjunctivitis were presented to general practitioners from a population of N = 375,899, resulting in an overall incidence rate of 13.9 per 1000 person-years, varying from more than 80/1000 py in children up to one-year old, to less than 12/1000 py in children over the age of 4. Topical ophthalmic ointments were prescribed in 87% of the episodes, of which 80% was antibiotic treatment. Fusidic acid gel was most frequently prescribed (69%). In most episodes general practitioners did not adhere to the guideline. CONCLUSION: In 2001, the management of infectious conjunctivitis by Dutch general practitioners was not in accordance with the recommendations of the consensus-based guideline published five years previously, despite its wide distribution. In 2006 this guideline was revised. Its successful implementation requires more than distribution alone. Probably the most effective way to achieve this is by following a model for systemic implementation. BioMed Central 2007-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2034564/ /pubmed/17868475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54 Text en Copyright © 2007 Rietveld et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rietveld, Remco P ter Riet, Gerben Bindels, Patrick JE Schellevis, François G van Weert, Henk CPM Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title | Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title_full | Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title_fullStr | Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title_short | Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice |
title_sort | do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? results of the second dutch national survey of general practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17868475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rietveldremcop dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice AT terrietgerben dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice AT bindelspatrickje dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice AT schellevisfrancoisg dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice AT vanweerthenkcpm dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice |