Cargando…

Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice

BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rietveld, Remco P, ter Riet, Gerben, Bindels, Patrick JE, Schellevis, François G, van Weert, Henk CPM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17868475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54
_version_ 1782137023699615744
author Rietveld, Remco P
ter Riet, Gerben
Bindels, Patrick JE
Schellevis, François G
van Weert, Henk CPM
author_facet Rietveld, Remco P
ter Riet, Gerben
Bindels, Patrick JE
Schellevis, François G
van Weert, Henk CPM
author_sort Rietveld, Remco P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became available from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. We measured the age-specific incidence of infectious conjunctivitis, described its management by Dutch general practitioners, and then compared these findings with the recommendations made in the guideline. METHODS: In 2001, over a 12-month period, data from all patient contacts with 195 general practitioners were taken from electronic medical records. Registration was episode-oriented; all consultations dealing with the same health problem were grouped into disease episodes. Data concerning all episodes of infectious conjunctivitis (ICPC-code F70 and sub codes) were analysed. RESULTS: Over one year, 5,213 new and recurrent episodes of infectious conjunctivitis were presented to general practitioners from a population of N = 375,899, resulting in an overall incidence rate of 13.9 per 1000 person-years, varying from more than 80/1000 py in children up to one-year old, to less than 12/1000 py in children over the age of 4. Topical ophthalmic ointments were prescribed in 87% of the episodes, of which 80% was antibiotic treatment. Fusidic acid gel was most frequently prescribed (69%). In most episodes general practitioners did not adhere to the guideline. CONCLUSION: In 2001, the management of infectious conjunctivitis by Dutch general practitioners was not in accordance with the recommendations of the consensus-based guideline published five years previously, despite its wide distribution. In 2006 this guideline was revised. Its successful implementation requires more than distribution alone. Probably the most effective way to achieve this is by following a model for systemic implementation.
format Text
id pubmed-2034564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20345642007-10-19 Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice Rietveld, Remco P ter Riet, Gerben Bindels, Patrick JE Schellevis, François G van Weert, Henk CPM BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: In 1996 the guideline 'The Red Eye' was first published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The extent to which general practitioners adhere to this guideline is unclear. Recently, data on the management of infectious conjunctivitis by general practitioners became available from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. We measured the age-specific incidence of infectious conjunctivitis, described its management by Dutch general practitioners, and then compared these findings with the recommendations made in the guideline. METHODS: In 2001, over a 12-month period, data from all patient contacts with 195 general practitioners were taken from electronic medical records. Registration was episode-oriented; all consultations dealing with the same health problem were grouped into disease episodes. Data concerning all episodes of infectious conjunctivitis (ICPC-code F70 and sub codes) were analysed. RESULTS: Over one year, 5,213 new and recurrent episodes of infectious conjunctivitis were presented to general practitioners from a population of N = 375,899, resulting in an overall incidence rate of 13.9 per 1000 person-years, varying from more than 80/1000 py in children up to one-year old, to less than 12/1000 py in children over the age of 4. Topical ophthalmic ointments were prescribed in 87% of the episodes, of which 80% was antibiotic treatment. Fusidic acid gel was most frequently prescribed (69%). In most episodes general practitioners did not adhere to the guideline. CONCLUSION: In 2001, the management of infectious conjunctivitis by Dutch general practitioners was not in accordance with the recommendations of the consensus-based guideline published five years previously, despite its wide distribution. In 2006 this guideline was revised. Its successful implementation requires more than distribution alone. Probably the most effective way to achieve this is by following a model for systemic implementation. BioMed Central 2007-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2034564/ /pubmed/17868475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54 Text en Copyright © 2007 Rietveld et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rietveld, Remco P
ter Riet, Gerben
Bindels, Patrick JE
Schellevis, François G
van Weert, Henk CPM
Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title_full Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title_fullStr Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title_full_unstemmed Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title_short Do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? Results of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
title_sort do general practitioners adhere to the guideline on infectious conjunctivitis? results of the second dutch national survey of general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2034564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17868475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-54
work_keys_str_mv AT rietveldremcop dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice
AT terrietgerben dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice
AT bindelspatrickje dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice
AT schellevisfrancoisg dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice
AT vanweerthenkcpm dogeneralpractitionersadheretotheguidelineoninfectiousconjunctivitisresultsoftheseconddutchnationalsurveyofgeneralpractice