Cargando…

Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: In orthodontic treatment, anchorage control is a fundamental aspect. Usually conventional mechanism for orthodontic anchorage control can be either extraoral or intraoral that is headgear or intermaxillary elastics. Their use are combined with various side effects such as tipping of occl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Britta A, Wehrbein, Heinrich, Hopfenmüller, Werner, Harzer, Winfried, Gedrange, Tomasz, Diedrich, Peter, Kunkel, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2039736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17883841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-24
_version_ 1782137037127680000
author Jung, Britta A
Wehrbein, Heinrich
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Harzer, Winfried
Gedrange, Tomasz
Diedrich, Peter
Kunkel, Martin
author_facet Jung, Britta A
Wehrbein, Heinrich
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Harzer, Winfried
Gedrange, Tomasz
Diedrich, Peter
Kunkel, Martin
author_sort Jung, Britta A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In orthodontic treatment, anchorage control is a fundamental aspect. Usually conventional mechanism for orthodontic anchorage control can be either extraoral or intraoral that is headgear or intermaxillary elastics. Their use are combined with various side effects such as tipping of occlusal plane or undesirable movements of teeth. Especially in cases, where key-teeth are missing, conventional anchorage defined as tooth-borne anchorage will meet limitations. Therefore, the use of endosseous implants for anchorage purposes are increasingly used to achieve positional stability and maximum anchorage. METHODS/DESIGN: The intended study is designed as a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing and contrasting the effect of early loading of palatal implant therapy versus implant loading after 12 weeks post implantation using the new ortho-implant type II anchor system device (Orthosystem Straumann, Basel, Switzerland). 124 participants, mainly adult males or females, whose diagnoses require temporary stationary implant-based anchorage treatment will be randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment groups: group 1 will receive a loading of implant standard therapy after a healing period of 12 week (gold standard), whereas group 2 will receive an early loading of orthodontic implants within 1 week after implant insertion. Participants will be at least followed for 12 months after implant placement. The primary endpoint is to investigate the behavior of early loaded palatal implants in order to find out if shorter healing periods might be justified to accelerate active orthodontic treatment. Secondary outcomes will focus e.g. on achievement of orthodontic treatment goals and quantity of direct implant-bone interface of removed bone specimens. As tertiary objective, a histologic and microtomography evaluation of all retrieved implants will be performed to obtain data on the performance of the SLA surface in human bone evaluation of all retrieved implants. Additionally, resonance frequency analysis (RFA, Osstell™ mentor) will be used at different times for clinically monitoring the implant stability and for histological comparison in order to measure the reliability of the resonance frequency measuring device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN97142521.
format Text
id pubmed-2039736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20397362007-10-20 Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial Jung, Britta A Wehrbein, Heinrich Hopfenmüller, Werner Harzer, Winfried Gedrange, Tomasz Diedrich, Peter Kunkel, Martin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In orthodontic treatment, anchorage control is a fundamental aspect. Usually conventional mechanism for orthodontic anchorage control can be either extraoral or intraoral that is headgear or intermaxillary elastics. Their use are combined with various side effects such as tipping of occlusal plane or undesirable movements of teeth. Especially in cases, where key-teeth are missing, conventional anchorage defined as tooth-borne anchorage will meet limitations. Therefore, the use of endosseous implants for anchorage purposes are increasingly used to achieve positional stability and maximum anchorage. METHODS/DESIGN: The intended study is designed as a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing and contrasting the effect of early loading of palatal implant therapy versus implant loading after 12 weeks post implantation using the new ortho-implant type II anchor system device (Orthosystem Straumann, Basel, Switzerland). 124 participants, mainly adult males or females, whose diagnoses require temporary stationary implant-based anchorage treatment will be randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment groups: group 1 will receive a loading of implant standard therapy after a healing period of 12 week (gold standard), whereas group 2 will receive an early loading of orthodontic implants within 1 week after implant insertion. Participants will be at least followed for 12 months after implant placement. The primary endpoint is to investigate the behavior of early loaded palatal implants in order to find out if shorter healing periods might be justified to accelerate active orthodontic treatment. Secondary outcomes will focus e.g. on achievement of orthodontic treatment goals and quantity of direct implant-bone interface of removed bone specimens. As tertiary objective, a histologic and microtomography evaluation of all retrieved implants will be performed to obtain data on the performance of the SLA surface in human bone evaluation of all retrieved implants. Additionally, resonance frequency analysis (RFA, Osstell™ mentor) will be used at different times for clinically monitoring the implant stability and for histological comparison in order to measure the reliability of the resonance frequency measuring device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN97142521. BioMed Central 2007-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2039736/ /pubmed/17883841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-24 Text en Copyright © 2007 Jung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Jung, Britta A
Wehrbein, Heinrich
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Harzer, Winfried
Gedrange, Tomasz
Diedrich, Peter
Kunkel, Martin
Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type ii) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2039736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17883841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-24
work_keys_str_mv AT jungbrittaa earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wehrbeinheinrich earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hopfenmullerwerner earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT harzerwinfried earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT gedrangetomasz earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT diedrichpeter earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT kunkelmartin earlyloadingofplalatalimplantsorthotypeiiaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial