Cargando…
Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care
SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE: The efficxacy of triptans for acute migraine has been well established in clinical trials but not in primary care, where they are most commonly prescribed. The aim of this open-label study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eletriptan 40 mg in primary care, using a patient-weig...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2040196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17877653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01513.x |
_version_ | 1782137081100763136 |
---|---|
author | Nett, R B Tiseo, P J Almas, M Sikes, C R |
author_facet | Nett, R B Tiseo, P J Almas, M Sikes, C R |
author_sort | Nett, R B |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE: The efficxacy of triptans for acute migraine has been well established in clinical trials but not in primary care, where they are most commonly prescribed. The aim of this open-label study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eletriptan 40 mg in primary care, using a patient-weighted satisfaction scale. METHODS: Eligible patients met International Headache Society criteria for migraine, with 1–6 attacks per month. Patients completed questionnaires at screening and following a single eletriptan-treated attack. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a six-item Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ item scores were weighted, based on the important score ratings, to yield individualised satisfaction scores. The primary end-point was the difference in weighted satisfaction scores between the patient's previous treatment and eletriptan 40 mg. Secondary end-points assessed quality of life (QOL), functioning and efficacy of treatment. RESULTS: Of 590 patients screened, 437 completed the study. Degree (95.2%), time (88.8%) and duration (83.8%) of headache pain relief were rated as most important by patients. The mean (±SD) total satisfaction score on the MSQ was higher for eletriptan than previous therapy (2.2 ± 3.0 vs. 0.6 ± 2.4; p < 0.001). The high level of satisfaction with eletriptan vs. previous treatment reflects the improvements in QOL and functioning observed, and the high headache and pain-free response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-weighted satisfaction with eletriptan 40 mg was higher than with previous treatment for all items. The use of patient-weighted importance ratings of satisfaction is a promising approach for establishing effectiveness of treatment in primary care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2040196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20401962007-10-25 Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care Nett, R B Tiseo, P J Almas, M Sikes, C R Int J Clin Pract Original Papers SUMMARY: OBJECTIVE: The efficxacy of triptans for acute migraine has been well established in clinical trials but not in primary care, where they are most commonly prescribed. The aim of this open-label study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eletriptan 40 mg in primary care, using a patient-weighted satisfaction scale. METHODS: Eligible patients met International Headache Society criteria for migraine, with 1–6 attacks per month. Patients completed questionnaires at screening and following a single eletriptan-treated attack. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a six-item Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ item scores were weighted, based on the important score ratings, to yield individualised satisfaction scores. The primary end-point was the difference in weighted satisfaction scores between the patient's previous treatment and eletriptan 40 mg. Secondary end-points assessed quality of life (QOL), functioning and efficacy of treatment. RESULTS: Of 590 patients screened, 437 completed the study. Degree (95.2%), time (88.8%) and duration (83.8%) of headache pain relief were rated as most important by patients. The mean (±SD) total satisfaction score on the MSQ was higher for eletriptan than previous therapy (2.2 ± 3.0 vs. 0.6 ± 2.4; p < 0.001). The high level of satisfaction with eletriptan vs. previous treatment reflects the improvements in QOL and functioning observed, and the high headache and pain-free response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-weighted satisfaction with eletriptan 40 mg was higher than with previous treatment for all items. The use of patient-weighted importance ratings of satisfaction is a promising approach for establishing effectiveness of treatment in primary care. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2040196/ /pubmed/17877653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01513.x Text en © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Nett, R B Tiseo, P J Almas, M Sikes, C R Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title | Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title_full | Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title_fullStr | Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title_short | Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
title_sort | patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2040196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17877653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01513.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nettrb patientsatisfactionwitheletriptanintheacutetreatmentofmigraineinprimarycare AT tiseopj patientsatisfactionwitheletriptanintheacutetreatmentofmigraineinprimarycare AT almasm patientsatisfactionwitheletriptanintheacutetreatmentofmigraineinprimarycare AT sikescr patientsatisfactionwitheletriptanintheacutetreatmentofmigraineinprimarycare |