Cargando…

The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully trace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Jayne, Murphy, Elizabeth, Bergen, Helen, Casey, Deborah, Hawton, Keith, Owens, David, Lilley, Rachael, Noble, Rachael, Kapur, Navneet
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2041945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17888150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16
_version_ 1782137096740274176
author Cooper, Jayne
Murphy, Elizabeth
Bergen, Helen
Casey, Deborah
Hawton, Keith
Owens, David
Lilley, Rachael
Noble, Rachael
Kapur, Navneet
author_facet Cooper, Jayne
Murphy, Elizabeth
Bergen, Helen
Casey, Deborah
Hawton, Keith
Owens, David
Lilley, Rachael
Noble, Rachael
Kapur, Navneet
author_sort Cooper, Jayne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully traced and to investigate the characteristics of patients associated with non-capture. METHOD: This was a descriptive study of people attending after self-harm using allocation of NHS numbers as main outcome measurement. Data from the Multicentre Monitoring of Self-Harm Project from 3 centres in England were used to identify consecutive patients (N = 3000) who were treated in six emergency departments in Oxford, Manchester and Leeds in 2004 and 2005 following self-harm. RESULTS: NHS number was available between 55–73% of individuals across centres. Characteristics associated with non-recording of NHS number in more than one centre included those from ethnic minority groups (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p = 0.004; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p ≤0.001) and the homeless or living in a hostel or other institution (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 40.9, df = 7, p = <0.001; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 23.5, df = 7, p = 0.001). Individual centre characteristics included being of male gender (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 4.1, df = 1, p = 0.4), those under 25 years (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 10.6, df = 2, p = 0.005), not being admitted to general hospital (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 223.6, df = 1, p ≤0.001) and using self-injury as a method of harm (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 41.5, df = 2, p ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Basing research studies on NHS number as the unique identifier, as suggested by the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Patient Information Advisory Group, would exclude some of the most vulnerable groups for further self-harm or suicide. This bias may also affect other research registers.
format Text
id pubmed-2041945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20419452007-10-25 The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study Cooper, Jayne Murphy, Elizabeth Bergen, Helen Casey, Deborah Hawton, Keith Owens, David Lilley, Rachael Noble, Rachael Kapur, Navneet Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Short report BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully traced and to investigate the characteristics of patients associated with non-capture. METHOD: This was a descriptive study of people attending after self-harm using allocation of NHS numbers as main outcome measurement. Data from the Multicentre Monitoring of Self-Harm Project from 3 centres in England were used to identify consecutive patients (N = 3000) who were treated in six emergency departments in Oxford, Manchester and Leeds in 2004 and 2005 following self-harm. RESULTS: NHS number was available between 55–73% of individuals across centres. Characteristics associated with non-recording of NHS number in more than one centre included those from ethnic minority groups (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p = 0.004; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p ≤0.001) and the homeless or living in a hostel or other institution (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 40.9, df = 7, p = <0.001; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 23.5, df = 7, p = 0.001). Individual centre characteristics included being of male gender (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 4.1, df = 1, p = 0.4), those under 25 years (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 10.6, df = 2, p = 0.005), not being admitted to general hospital (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 223.6, df = 1, p ≤0.001) and using self-injury as a method of harm (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 41.5, df = 2, p ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Basing research studies on NHS number as the unique identifier, as suggested by the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Patient Information Advisory Group, would exclude some of the most vulnerable groups for further self-harm or suicide. This bias may also affect other research registers. BioMed Central 2007-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2041945/ /pubmed/17888150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16 Text en Copyright ©2007 Cooper et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short report
Cooper, Jayne
Murphy, Elizabeth
Bergen, Helen
Casey, Deborah
Hawton, Keith
Owens, David
Lilley, Rachael
Noble, Rachael
Kapur, Navneet
The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title_full The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title_fullStr The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title_short The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
title_sort effect of using nhs number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
topic Short report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2041945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17888150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperjayne theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT murphyelizabeth theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT bergenhelen theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT caseydeborah theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT hawtonkeith theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT owensdavid theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT lilleyrachael theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT noblerachael theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT kapurnavneet theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT cooperjayne effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT murphyelizabeth effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT bergenhelen effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT caseydeborah effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT hawtonkeith effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT owensdavid effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT lilleyrachael effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT noblerachael effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy
AT kapurnavneet effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy