Cargando…
The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study
BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully trace...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2041945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17888150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16 |
_version_ | 1782137096740274176 |
---|---|
author | Cooper, Jayne Murphy, Elizabeth Bergen, Helen Casey, Deborah Hawton, Keith Owens, David Lilley, Rachael Noble, Rachael Kapur, Navneet |
author_facet | Cooper, Jayne Murphy, Elizabeth Bergen, Helen Casey, Deborah Hawton, Keith Owens, David Lilley, Rachael Noble, Rachael Kapur, Navneet |
author_sort | Cooper, Jayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully traced and to investigate the characteristics of patients associated with non-capture. METHOD: This was a descriptive study of people attending after self-harm using allocation of NHS numbers as main outcome measurement. Data from the Multicentre Monitoring of Self-Harm Project from 3 centres in England were used to identify consecutive patients (N = 3000) who were treated in six emergency departments in Oxford, Manchester and Leeds in 2004 and 2005 following self-harm. RESULTS: NHS number was available between 55–73% of individuals across centres. Characteristics associated with non-recording of NHS number in more than one centre included those from ethnic minority groups (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p = 0.004; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p ≤0.001) and the homeless or living in a hostel or other institution (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 40.9, df = 7, p = <0.001; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 23.5, df = 7, p = 0.001). Individual centre characteristics included being of male gender (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 4.1, df = 1, p = 0.4), those under 25 years (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 10.6, df = 2, p = 0.005), not being admitted to general hospital (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 223.6, df = 1, p ≤0.001) and using self-injury as a method of harm (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 41.5, df = 2, p ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Basing research studies on NHS number as the unique identifier, as suggested by the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Patient Information Advisory Group, would exclude some of the most vulnerable groups for further self-harm or suicide. This bias may also affect other research registers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2041945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20419452007-10-25 The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study Cooper, Jayne Murphy, Elizabeth Bergen, Helen Casey, Deborah Hawton, Keith Owens, David Lilley, Rachael Noble, Rachael Kapur, Navneet Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Short report BACKGROUND: Processing personal data for research purposes and the requirement of anonymity has been the subject of recent debate. We aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who present to emergency departments with non-fatal suicidal behavior where an NHS number has been successfully traced and to investigate the characteristics of patients associated with non-capture. METHOD: This was a descriptive study of people attending after self-harm using allocation of NHS numbers as main outcome measurement. Data from the Multicentre Monitoring of Self-Harm Project from 3 centres in England were used to identify consecutive patients (N = 3000) who were treated in six emergency departments in Oxford, Manchester and Leeds in 2004 and 2005 following self-harm. RESULTS: NHS number was available between 55–73% of individuals across centres. Characteristics associated with non-recording of NHS number in more than one centre included those from ethnic minority groups (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p = 0.004; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 13.6, df = 3, p ≤0.001) and the homeless or living in a hostel or other institution (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 40.9, df = 7, p = <0.001; Manchester: chi-squared statistic = 23.5, df = 7, p = 0.001). Individual centre characteristics included being of male gender (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 4.1, df = 1, p = 0.4), those under 25 years (Oxford: chi-squared statistic = 10.6, df = 2, p = 0.005), not being admitted to general hospital (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 223.6, df = 1, p ≤0.001) and using self-injury as a method of harm (Leeds: chi-squared statistic = 41.5, df = 2, p ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Basing research studies on NHS number as the unique identifier, as suggested by the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Patient Information Advisory Group, would exclude some of the most vulnerable groups for further self-harm or suicide. This bias may also affect other research registers. BioMed Central 2007-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2041945/ /pubmed/17888150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16 Text en Copyright ©2007 Cooper et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short report Cooper, Jayne Murphy, Elizabeth Bergen, Helen Casey, Deborah Hawton, Keith Owens, David Lilley, Rachael Noble, Rachael Kapur, Navneet The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title | The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title_full | The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title_fullStr | The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title_short | The effect of using NHS number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
title_sort | effect of using nhs number as the unique identifier for patients who self-harm: a multi-centre descriptive study |
topic | Short report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2041945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17888150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cooperjayne theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT murphyelizabeth theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT bergenhelen theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT caseydeborah theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT hawtonkeith theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT owensdavid theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT lilleyrachael theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT noblerachael theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT kapurnavneet theeffectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT cooperjayne effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT murphyelizabeth effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT bergenhelen effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT caseydeborah effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT hawtonkeith effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT owensdavid effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT lilleyrachael effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT noblerachael effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy AT kapurnavneet effectofusingnhsnumberastheuniqueidentifierforpatientswhoselfharmamulticentredescriptivestudy |