Cargando…

Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study

BACKGROUND: Field-testing is a quality assurance criterion in the development of patient decision-support technologies (PDSTs), as identified in the consensus statement of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. We incorporated field-testing into the development of a Web-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Rhodri, Elwyn, Glyn, Edwards, Adrian, Watson, Eila, Austoker, Joan, Grol, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2047286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17627930
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e21
_version_ 1782137149656662016
author Evans, Rhodri
Elwyn, Glyn
Edwards, Adrian
Watson, Eila
Austoker, Joan
Grol, Richard
author_facet Evans, Rhodri
Elwyn, Glyn
Edwards, Adrian
Watson, Eila
Austoker, Joan
Grol, Richard
author_sort Evans, Rhodri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Field-testing is a quality assurance criterion in the development of patient decision-support technologies (PDSTs), as identified in the consensus statement of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. We incorporated field-testing into the development of a Web-based, prostate-specific antigen PDST called Prosdex, which was commissioned as part of the UK Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a model for the future field-testing of PDSTs, based on the field-testing of Prosdex. Our objectives were (1) to explore the reactions of men to evolving prototypes of Prosdex, (2) to assess the effect of these responses on the development process, and (3) to develop a model for field-testing PDSTs based on the responses and their effect on the development process. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the men after they had viewed evolving prototypes of Prosdex in their homes. The men were grouped according to the prototype viewed. Men between 40 and 75 years of age were recruited from two family practices in different parts of Wales, United Kingdom. In the interviews, the men were asked for their views on Prosdex, both as a whole and in relation to specific sections such as the introduction and video clips. Comments and technical issues that arose during the viewings were noted and fed back to the developers in order to produce subsequent prototypes. RESULTS: A total of 27 men were interviewed, in five groups, according to the five prototypes of Prosdex that were developed. The two main themes from the interviews were the responses to the information provided in Prosdex and the responses to specific features of Prosdex. Within these themes, two of the most frequently encountered categories were detail of the information provided and balance between contrasting viewpoints. Criticisms were encountered, particularly with respect to navigation of the site. In addition, we found that participants made little use of the decision-making scale. The introduction of an interactive contents page to prototype 2 was the main change made to Prosdex as a result of the field-testing. Based on our findings, a model for the field-testing of PDSTs was developed, involving an exploratory field-testing stage between the planning stage and the development of the first prototype, and followed by the prototype field-testing stage, leading to the final PDST. CONCLUSIONS: In the field-testing of Prosdex, a Web-based prostate-specific antigen PDST, the responses of interviewed men were generally favorable. As a consequence of the responses, an interactive contents page was added to the site. We developed a model for the future field-testing of PDSTs, involving two stages: exploratory field-testing and prototype field-testing.
format Text
id pubmed-2047286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20472862007-11-30 Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study Evans, Rhodri Elwyn, Glyn Edwards, Adrian Watson, Eila Austoker, Joan Grol, Richard J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Field-testing is a quality assurance criterion in the development of patient decision-support technologies (PDSTs), as identified in the consensus statement of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. We incorporated field-testing into the development of a Web-based, prostate-specific antigen PDST called Prosdex, which was commissioned as part of the UK Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a model for the future field-testing of PDSTs, based on the field-testing of Prosdex. Our objectives were (1) to explore the reactions of men to evolving prototypes of Prosdex, (2) to assess the effect of these responses on the development process, and (3) to develop a model for field-testing PDSTs based on the responses and their effect on the development process. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with the men after they had viewed evolving prototypes of Prosdex in their homes. The men were grouped according to the prototype viewed. Men between 40 and 75 years of age were recruited from two family practices in different parts of Wales, United Kingdom. In the interviews, the men were asked for their views on Prosdex, both as a whole and in relation to specific sections such as the introduction and video clips. Comments and technical issues that arose during the viewings were noted and fed back to the developers in order to produce subsequent prototypes. RESULTS: A total of 27 men were interviewed, in five groups, according to the five prototypes of Prosdex that were developed. The two main themes from the interviews were the responses to the information provided in Prosdex and the responses to specific features of Prosdex. Within these themes, two of the most frequently encountered categories were detail of the information provided and balance between contrasting viewpoints. Criticisms were encountered, particularly with respect to navigation of the site. In addition, we found that participants made little use of the decision-making scale. The introduction of an interactive contents page to prototype 2 was the main change made to Prosdex as a result of the field-testing. Based on our findings, a model for the field-testing of PDSTs was developed, involving an exploratory field-testing stage between the planning stage and the development of the first prototype, and followed by the prototype field-testing stage, leading to the final PDST. CONCLUSIONS: In the field-testing of Prosdex, a Web-based prostate-specific antigen PDST, the responses of interviewed men were generally favorable. As a consequence of the responses, an interactive contents page was added to the site. We developed a model for the future field-testing of PDSTs, involving two stages: exploratory field-testing and prototype field-testing. Gunther Eysenbach 2007-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2047286/ /pubmed/17627930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e21 Text en © Rhodri Evans, Glyn Elwyn, Adrian Edwards, Eila Watson, Joan Austoker, Richard Grol. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org, 13.07.2007). Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Evans, Rhodri
Elwyn, Glyn
Edwards, Adrian
Watson, Eila
Austoker, Joan
Grol, Richard
Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title_full Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title_fullStr Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title_full_unstemmed Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title_short Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study
title_sort toward a model for field-testing patient decision-support technologies: a qualitative field-testing study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2047286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17627930
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e21
work_keys_str_mv AT evansrhodri towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy
AT elwynglyn towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy
AT edwardsadrian towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy
AT watsoneila towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy
AT austokerjoan towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy
AT grolrichard towardamodelforfieldtestingpatientdecisionsupporttechnologiesaqualitativefieldtestingstudy