Cargando…
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature
Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) can be a source of low back pain. The complexity of the system involving the SIJ and the varied SIJ pain referral pattern makes it difficult to clinically assess SIJ dysfunction. Despite the emergence of detail of the SIJ complex, the basis of the clinical test...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central|1
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17987177 |
_version_ | 1782137203648888832 |
---|---|
author | Cattley, Peter Winyard, James Trevaskis, John Eaton, Sharyn |
author_facet | Cattley, Peter Winyard, James Trevaskis, John Eaton, Sharyn |
author_sort | Cattley, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) can be a source of low back pain. The complexity of the system involving the SIJ and the varied SIJ pain referral pattern makes it difficult to clinically assess SIJ dysfunction. Despite the emergence of detail of the SIJ complex, the basis of the clinical tests has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective: To review the literature from the last decade dealing with the validity and reliability of clinical tests for SIJ dysfunction in order to determine which tests are reliable and valid. Discussion: For clinical tests with multiple studies, there was agreement on reliability for Gaenslens, Thigh Thrust test, Finger Point test and SIJ Pain Mapping and agreement on validity for Thigh Thrust test. However, Gillets Test, Patrick’s FABER and Sacral Thrust/Compression were considered invalid and unreliable, although these results may have been influenced by methodological shortcomings. Examination of the entire SIJ complex may mean that a series of tests are required. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2051080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central|1 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-20510802007-11-06 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature Cattley, Peter Winyard, James Trevaskis, John Eaton, Sharyn Australas Chiropr Osteopathy Article Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) can be a source of low back pain. The complexity of the system involving the SIJ and the varied SIJ pain referral pattern makes it difficult to clinically assess SIJ dysfunction. Despite the emergence of detail of the SIJ complex, the basis of the clinical tests has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective: To review the literature from the last decade dealing with the validity and reliability of clinical tests for SIJ dysfunction in order to determine which tests are reliable and valid. Discussion: For clinical tests with multiple studies, there was agreement on reliability for Gaenslens, Thigh Thrust test, Finger Point test and SIJ Pain Mapping and agreement on validity for Thigh Thrust test. However, Gillets Test, Patrick’s FABER and Sacral Thrust/Compression were considered invalid and unreliable, although these results may have been influenced by methodological shortcomings. Examination of the entire SIJ complex may mean that a series of tests are required. BioMed Central|1 2002-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2051080/ /pubmed/17987177 Text en Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia |
spellingShingle | Article Cattley, Peter Winyard, James Trevaskis, John Eaton, Sharyn VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title | VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title_full | VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title_fullStr | VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title_short | VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL TESTS FOR THE SACROILIAC JOINT: A Review of Literature |
title_sort | validity and reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint: a review of literature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17987177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cattleypeter validityandreliabilityofclinicaltestsforthesacroiliacjointareviewofliterature AT winyardjames validityandreliabilityofclinicaltestsforthesacroiliacjointareviewofliterature AT trevaskisjohn validityandreliabilityofclinicaltestsforthesacroiliacjointareviewofliterature AT eatonsharyn validityandreliabilityofclinicaltestsforthesacroiliacjointareviewofliterature |