Cargando…

First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.

As of June 1998, four randomized trials have been completed comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with a cisplatin-based control arm. The results of three of these trials are available; one has been published as a full paper, the other two in abstract form only. Two of the reported t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandercock, J., Parmar, M. K., Torri, V.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group|1 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9836480
_version_ 1782137289468542976
author Sandercock, J.
Parmar, M. K.
Torri, V.
author_facet Sandercock, J.
Parmar, M. K.
Torri, V.
author_sort Sandercock, J.
collection PubMed
description As of June 1998, four randomized trials have been completed comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with a cisplatin-based control arm. The results of three of these trials are available; one has been published as a full paper, the other two in abstract form only. Two of the reported trials (GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial) provide clear evidence that cisplatin combined with paclitaxel is a more effective regimen than one using the same dose of cisplatin combined with cyclophosphamide. The results of the third reported trial (GOG-132) are rather different, suggesting that a higher dose of single-agent cisplatin may be as effective as the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination tested in the other two trials. A number of explanations for these unexpected results have been proposed: false-positive results in GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial; false-negative results in GOG-132; high crossover in GOG-132 (including crossover before progression); the cyclophosphamide in the control arm of GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial had a negative impact on outcome in the control group in these trials; the higher dose of cisplatin when used as a single agent in GOG-132 had a positive impact on outcome for the control group in this trial. These explanations are discussed in detail, and their implications explored.
format Text
id pubmed-2063206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
publisher Nature Publishing Group|1
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20632062009-09-10 First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence. Sandercock, J. Parmar, M. K. Torri, V. Br J Cancer Research Article As of June 1998, four randomized trials have been completed comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with a cisplatin-based control arm. The results of three of these trials are available; one has been published as a full paper, the other two in abstract form only. Two of the reported trials (GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial) provide clear evidence that cisplatin combined with paclitaxel is a more effective regimen than one using the same dose of cisplatin combined with cyclophosphamide. The results of the third reported trial (GOG-132) are rather different, suggesting that a higher dose of single-agent cisplatin may be as effective as the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination tested in the other two trials. A number of explanations for these unexpected results have been proposed: false-positive results in GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial; false-negative results in GOG-132; high crossover in GOG-132 (including crossover before progression); the cyclophosphamide in the control arm of GOG-111 and the Intergroup trial had a negative impact on outcome in the control group in these trials; the higher dose of cisplatin when used as a single agent in GOG-132 had a positive impact on outcome for the control group in this trial. These explanations are discussed in detail, and their implications explored. Nature Publishing Group|1 1998-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2063206/ /pubmed/9836480 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandercock, J.
Parmar, M. K.
Torri, V.
First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title_full First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title_fullStr First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title_full_unstemmed First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title_short First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
title_sort first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidence.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9836480
work_keys_str_mv AT sandercockj firstlinechemotherapyforadvancedovariancancerpaclitaxelcisplatinandtheevidence
AT parmarmk firstlinechemotherapyforadvancedovariancancerpaclitaxelcisplatinandtheevidence
AT torriv firstlinechemotherapyforadvancedovariancancerpaclitaxelcisplatinandtheevidence