Cargando…

Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos

In most cells, the DNA damage checkpoint delays cell division when replication is stalled by DNA damage. In early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, however, the checkpoint responds to developmental signals that control the timing of cell division, and checkpoint activation by nondevelopmental inputs d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holway, Antonia H., Kim, Seung-Hwan, La Volpe, Adriana, Michael, W. Matthew
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16549501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512136
_version_ 1782137384982282240
author Holway, Antonia H.
Kim, Seung-Hwan
La Volpe, Adriana
Michael, W. Matthew
author_facet Holway, Antonia H.
Kim, Seung-Hwan
La Volpe, Adriana
Michael, W. Matthew
author_sort Holway, Antonia H.
collection PubMed
description In most cells, the DNA damage checkpoint delays cell division when replication is stalled by DNA damage. In early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, however, the checkpoint responds to developmental signals that control the timing of cell division, and checkpoint activation by nondevelopmental inputs disrupts cell cycle timing and causes embryonic lethality. Given this sensitivity to inappropriate checkpoint activation, we were interested in how embryos respond to DNA damage. We demonstrate that the checkpoint response to DNA damage is actively silenced in embryos but not in the germ line. Silencing requires rad-2, gei-17, and the polh-1 translesion DNA polymerase, which suppress replication fork stalling and thereby eliminate the checkpoint-activating signal. These results explain how checkpoint activation is restricted to developmental signals during embryogenesis and insulated from DNA damage. They also show that checkpoint activation is not an obligatory response to DNA damage and that pathways exist to bypass the checkpoint when survival depends on uninterrupted progression through the cell cycle.
format Text
id pubmed-2063758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20637582007-11-29 Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos Holway, Antonia H. Kim, Seung-Hwan La Volpe, Adriana Michael, W. Matthew J Cell Biol Research Articles In most cells, the DNA damage checkpoint delays cell division when replication is stalled by DNA damage. In early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, however, the checkpoint responds to developmental signals that control the timing of cell division, and checkpoint activation by nondevelopmental inputs disrupts cell cycle timing and causes embryonic lethality. Given this sensitivity to inappropriate checkpoint activation, we were interested in how embryos respond to DNA damage. We demonstrate that the checkpoint response to DNA damage is actively silenced in embryos but not in the germ line. Silencing requires rad-2, gei-17, and the polh-1 translesion DNA polymerase, which suppress replication fork stalling and thereby eliminate the checkpoint-activating signal. These results explain how checkpoint activation is restricted to developmental signals during embryogenesis and insulated from DNA damage. They also show that checkpoint activation is not an obligatory response to DNA damage and that pathways exist to bypass the checkpoint when survival depends on uninterrupted progression through the cell cycle. The Rockefeller University Press 2006-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2063758/ /pubmed/16549501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512136 Text en Copyright © 2006, The Rockefeller University Press This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Holway, Antonia H.
Kim, Seung-Hwan
La Volpe, Adriana
Michael, W. Matthew
Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title_full Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title_fullStr Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title_full_unstemmed Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title_short Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
title_sort checkpoint silencing during the dna damage response in caenorhabditis elegans embryos
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2063758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16549501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512136
work_keys_str_mv AT holwayantoniah checkpointsilencingduringthednadamageresponseincaenorhabditiselegansembryos
AT kimseunghwan checkpointsilencingduringthednadamageresponseincaenorhabditiselegansembryos
AT lavolpeadriana checkpointsilencingduringthednadamageresponseincaenorhabditiselegansembryos
AT michaelwmatthew checkpointsilencingduringthednadamageresponseincaenorhabditiselegansembryos