Cargando…

Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes

Comparison of whole genomes has revealed large and frequent changes in the size of gene families. These changes occur because of high rates of both gene gain (via duplication) and loss (via deletion or pseudogenization), as well as the evolution of entirely new genes. Here we use the genomes of 12 f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hahn, Matthew W, Han, Mira V, Han, Sang-Gook
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17997610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030197
_version_ 1782137653482749952
author Hahn, Matthew W
Han, Mira V
Han, Sang-Gook
author_facet Hahn, Matthew W
Han, Mira V
Han, Sang-Gook
author_sort Hahn, Matthew W
collection PubMed
description Comparison of whole genomes has revealed large and frequent changes in the size of gene families. These changes occur because of high rates of both gene gain (via duplication) and loss (via deletion or pseudogenization), as well as the evolution of entirely new genes. Here we use the genomes of 12 fully sequenced Drosophila species to study the gain and loss of genes at unprecedented resolution. We find large numbers of both gains and losses, with over 40% of all gene families differing in size among the Drosophila. Approximately 17 genes are estimated to be duplicated and fixed in a genome every million years, a rate on par with that previously found in both yeast and mammals. We find many instances of extreme expansions or contractions in the size of gene families, including the expansion of several sex- and spermatogenesis-related families in D. melanogaster that also evolve under positive selection at the nucleotide level. Newly evolved gene families in our dataset are associated with a class of testes-expressed genes known to have evolved de novo in a number of cases. Gene family comparisons also allow us to identify a number of annotated D. melanogaster genes that are unlikely to encode functional proteins, as well as to identify dozens of previously unannotated D. melanogaster genes with conserved homologs in the other Drosophila. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the apparent stasis in total gene number among species has masked rapid turnover in individual gene gain and loss. It is likely that this genomic revolving door has played a large role in shaping the morphological, physiological, and metabolic differences among species.
format Text
id pubmed-2065885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-20658852007-11-29 Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes Hahn, Matthew W Han, Mira V Han, Sang-Gook PLoS Genet Research Article Comparison of whole genomes has revealed large and frequent changes in the size of gene families. These changes occur because of high rates of both gene gain (via duplication) and loss (via deletion or pseudogenization), as well as the evolution of entirely new genes. Here we use the genomes of 12 fully sequenced Drosophila species to study the gain and loss of genes at unprecedented resolution. We find large numbers of both gains and losses, with over 40% of all gene families differing in size among the Drosophila. Approximately 17 genes are estimated to be duplicated and fixed in a genome every million years, a rate on par with that previously found in both yeast and mammals. We find many instances of extreme expansions or contractions in the size of gene families, including the expansion of several sex- and spermatogenesis-related families in D. melanogaster that also evolve under positive selection at the nucleotide level. Newly evolved gene families in our dataset are associated with a class of testes-expressed genes known to have evolved de novo in a number of cases. Gene family comparisons also allow us to identify a number of annotated D. melanogaster genes that are unlikely to encode functional proteins, as well as to identify dozens of previously unannotated D. melanogaster genes with conserved homologs in the other Drosophila. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the apparent stasis in total gene number among species has masked rapid turnover in individual gene gain and loss. It is likely that this genomic revolving door has played a large role in shaping the morphological, physiological, and metabolic differences among species. Public Library of Science 2007-11 2007-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2065885/ /pubmed/17997610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030197 Text en © 2007 Hahn et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hahn, Matthew W
Han, Mira V
Han, Sang-Gook
Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title_full Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title_fullStr Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title_full_unstemmed Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title_short Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
title_sort gene family evolution across 12 drosophila genomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17997610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030197
work_keys_str_mv AT hahnmattheww genefamilyevolutionacross12drosophilagenomes
AT hanmirav genefamilyevolutionacross12drosophilagenomes
AT hansanggook genefamilyevolutionacross12drosophilagenomes